CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Ananyakrishnaa Constructions Private Limited has made its mark in the construction industry, particularly in Tamil Nadu. However, recent data indicates challenges facing the company. In this post, we will explore the legal landscape involving Ananyakrishnaa Constructions, highlighting the complaints and legal cases that define their reputation in the market.
Despite operating in a competitive sector, Ananyakrishnaa Constructions has received a concerning number of complaints—five in total. Alarmingly, the company has not won a single case it has faced, with all five resulting in losses. This situation raises several red flags for potential buyers and stakeholders alike.
The data suggests a pattern in the cases that Ananyakrishnaa Constructions has lost. Key aspects include:
Interestingly, all the decisions made against Ananyakrishnaa Constructions were appeals filed by complainants. No cases resulted in a win for the builder; instead, they were directed to fulfill their obligations repeatedly. Thus, there appears to be a consistent failure on the part of the builder to adequately address the claims against them, leading to unfavorable rulings.
The outlook for Ananyakrishnaa Constructions Private Limited casts doubts regarding their reliability and commitment to customer satisfaction. With zero wins against five complaints resulting in losses, potential buyers should approach with caution. It highlights the importance of due diligence when selecting a builder, particularly concerning past performance and legal compliance.
If you are considering purchasing property from Ananyakrishnaa Constructions, keep the following tips in mind:
In the broader scope of purchasing property, consider these strategies when selecting any builder:
Being informed is your best tool in navigating the complex landscape of property investment. Good luck with your home-buying journey!
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Ananyakrishnaa Constructions Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common themes and disputes surrounding their projects.
The cases can be broadly categorized into four types: Delayed Possession Claims, Non-compliance with Municipal Orders, Disputes over Contractual Obligations, and Penalties for Project Delays. The majority of the claims revolved around the builder's failure to fulfill commitments as per the joint venture development agreement, particularly concerning the timely obtaining of the completion certificate from the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) and the payment of non-refundable deposits to owners.
A recurring reason for litigation in these cases was the builder's attribution of delays to external factors, specifically objections raised by the Manthope Colony Owners Association. However, the underlying pattern that emerged from the summaries indicates a common failure on the builder's part to comply with the terms of their agreements and to adhere to regulatory requirements.
The builder consistently lost these cases due to a combination of factors, including non-compliance with the directives of the authority, failure to register projects as required, and a lack of cooperation in resolving issues that were critical to the fulfillment of their obligations. The implications of these verdicts highlight a concerning trend in Ananyakrishnaa Constructions' operational practices, suggesting a disregard for both contractual commitments and regulatory frameworks that is likely to impact the trust placed by potential buyers in their projects.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E.P.No.35/2023 | Tamil Nadu | The Execution Petitioner prayed for enforcement o… | ["Recovery of amoun… | {"appellant_claim": "The Execution Petitioner pra… | Thiru T.V. Seethara… | Ananyakrishnaa Cons… | https://rera.tn.gov.in/cms/tnrera_judgements/2023/EP_No/35-2023.pdf |
E.P.No.7/2022 | Tamil Nadu | The Execution Petitioner sought enforcement of th… | ["Non-compliance wi… | {"appellant_claim": "The Execution Petitioner sou… | T.V. Seetharaman | Ananyakrishnaa Cons… | https://rera.tn.gov.in/cms/tnrera_judgements/2022/EP_No/7-2022.pdf |
C.Nos.130, 143 & 14… | Tamil Nadu | The complainants sought relief against the respon… | ["Real Estate", "Jo… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed tha… | N.Lakshmi | Ananyakrishnaa Cons… | https://rera.tn.gov.in/cms/tnrera_judgements/2020/130,143,145-2020.pdf |