No Logo Available

ANANYAKRISHNAA CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED

  • No of Complaints: 5
  • States (Active in): Tamil Nadu
CIN Not Available
Year Established Not Available
Address Not Available
Company Status Not Available

Introduction

Ananyakrishnaa Constructions Private Limited has made its mark in the construction industry, particularly in Tamil Nadu. However, recent data indicates challenges facing the company. In this post, we will explore the legal landscape involving Ananyakrishnaa Constructions, highlighting the complaints and legal cases that define their reputation in the market.

Overview of Complaints

Despite operating in a competitive sector, Ananyakrishnaa Constructions has received a concerning number of complaints—five in total. Alarmingly, the company has not won a single case it has faced, with all five resulting in losses. This situation raises several red flags for potential buyers and stakeholders alike.

Legal Case Analysis

Common Factors in Lost Cases

The data suggests a pattern in the cases that Ananyakrishnaa Constructions has lost. Key aspects include:

  • Commitment Issues: In multiple cases, complaints emphasized the builder's failure to fulfill obligations tied to the joint venture development agreement. Issues such as not obtaining the necessary completion certificate from CMDA and neglecting to pay non-refundable deposits to property owners were central claims.
  • Non-Compliance: The authority often found the builder in non-compliance with directives. In two notable instances, Ananyakrishnaa Constructions was penalized for failing to adhere to orders already established by the authority, which involved delivering possessions and meeting agreement terms.
  • Lack of Response: In some cases, the builder's non-appearance at hearings and absence of a compliance affidavit were significant factors leading to loss. This suggests an unwillingness or inability to engage with legal proceedings or rectify issues promptly.

Common Factors in Won Cases

Interestingly, all the decisions made against Ananyakrishnaa Constructions were appeals filed by complainants. No cases resulted in a win for the builder; instead, they were directed to fulfill their obligations repeatedly. Thus, there appears to be a consistent failure on the part of the builder to adequately address the claims against them, leading to unfavorable rulings.

Conclusion

The outlook for Ananyakrishnaa Constructions Private Limited casts doubts regarding their reliability and commitment to customer satisfaction. With zero wins against five complaints resulting in losses, potential buyers should approach with caution. It highlights the importance of due diligence when selecting a builder, particularly concerning past performance and legal compliance.

Tips for Potential Buyers

If you are considering purchasing property from Ananyakrishnaa Constructions, keep the following tips in mind:

  1. Conduct Thorough Research: Investigate the builder's past projects and client reviews to gain a clear understanding of their reliability.
  2. Request Documentation: Ensure all permits, completion certificates, and legal agreements are in order before making any commitments.
  3. Consult Legal Experts: Engage a legal expert to evaluate any contracts or agreements—this can safeguard against potential pitfalls.
  4. Engage With Current Homeowners: Speak to current or former residents to get firsthand insights on their experiences with the builder.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

In the broader scope of purchasing property, consider these strategies when selecting any builder:

  • Check Credentials: Verify that the builder is licensed and adheres to local regulations.
  • Read Reviews and Testimonials: Look for feedback online or through real estate platforms to assess the builder's reputation.
  • Visit Completed Projects: Physically visiting completed sites allows you to evaluate quality firsthand.
  • Examine Financial Stability: A financially sound builder is less likely to encounter delays or failures in project completion.

Being informed is your best tool in navigating the complex landscape of property investment. Good luck with your home-buying journey!

No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Delayed Possession Claims Non-compliance with Municipal Orders Disputes over Contractual Obligations Penalties for Project Delays

Analysis of the cases filed against Ananyakrishnaa Constructions Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common themes and disputes surrounding their projects.

The cases can be broadly categorized into four types: Delayed Possession Claims, Non-compliance with Municipal Orders, Disputes over Contractual Obligations, and Penalties for Project Delays. The majority of the claims revolved around the builder's failure to fulfill commitments as per the joint venture development agreement, particularly concerning the timely obtaining of the completion certificate from the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) and the payment of non-refundable deposits to owners.

A recurring reason for litigation in these cases was the builder's attribution of delays to external factors, specifically objections raised by the Manthope Colony Owners Association. However, the underlying pattern that emerged from the summaries indicates a common failure on the builder's part to comply with the terms of their agreements and to adhere to regulatory requirements.

The builder consistently lost these cases due to a combination of factors, including non-compliance with the directives of the authority, failure to register projects as required, and a lack of cooperation in resolving issues that were critical to the fulfillment of their obligations. The implications of these verdicts highlight a concerning trend in Ananyakrishnaa Constructions' operational practices, suggesting a disregard for both contractual commitments and regulatory frameworks that is likely to impact the trust placed by potential buyers in their projects.

This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.

Case Number State Summary Case Topic Detailed Summary Appellant Name Respondent Name Source
E.P.No.35/2023 Tamil Nadu The Execution Petitioner prayed for enforcement o… ["Recovery of amoun… {"appellant_claim": "The Execution Petitioner pra… Thiru T.V. Seethara… Ananyakrishnaa Cons… https://rera.tn.gov.in/cms/tnrera_judgements/2023/EP_No/35-2023.pdf
E.P.No.7/2022 Tamil Nadu The Execution Petitioner sought enforcement of th… ["Non-compliance wi… {"appellant_claim": "The Execution Petitioner sou… T.V. Seetharaman Ananyakrishnaa Cons… https://rera.tn.gov.in/cms/tnrera_judgements/2022/EP_No/7-2022.pdf
C.Nos.130, 143 & 14… Tamil Nadu The complainants sought relief against the respon… ["Real Estate", "Jo… {"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed tha… N.Lakshmi Ananyakrishnaa Cons… https://rera.tn.gov.in/cms/tnrera_judgements/2020/130,143,145-2020.pdf

Interested to buy from this builder?

Assured Callback in 5 mins