No Logo Available

ANANYAKRISHNAA CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED

3.8/5 (5 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Tamil Nadu
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

Ananyakrishnaa Constructions Private Limited has made its mark in the construction industry, particularly in Tamil Nadu. However, recent data indicates challenges facing the company. In this post, we will explore the legal landscape involving Ananyakrishnaa Constructions, highlighting the complaints and legal cases that define their reputation in the market.

Overview of Complaints

Despite operating in a competitive sector, Ananyakrishnaa Constructions has received a concerning number of complaints—five in total. Alarmingly, the company has not won a single case it has faced, with all five resulting in losses. This situation raises several red flags for potential buyers and stakeholders alike.

Legal Case Analysis

Common Factors in Lost Cases

The data suggests a pattern in the cases that Ananyakrishnaa Constructions has lost. Key aspects include:

  • Commitment Issues: In multiple cases, complaints emphasized the builder's failure to fulfill obligations tied to the joint venture development agreement. Issues such as not obtaining …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Non-compliance with Municipal Orders Disputes over Contractual Obligations Penalties for Project Delays

Analysis of the cases filed against Ananyakrishnaa Constructions Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common themes and disputes surrounding their projects.

The cases can be broadly categorized into four types: Delayed Possession Claims, Non-compliance with Municipal Orders, Disputes over Contractual Obligations, and Penalties for Project Delays. The majority of the claims revolved around the builder's failure to fulfill commitments as per the joint venture development agreement, particularly concerning the timely obtaining of the completion certificate from the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) and the payment of non-refundable deposits to owners.

A recurring reason for litigation in these cases was the builder's attribution of delays to external factors, specifically objections raised by the Manthope Colony Owners Association. However, the underlying pattern that emerged from the summaries indicates a common failure on the builder's part to comply with the terms of their agreements and to …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review