CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
When considering a builder for your next construction project, it's crucial to analyze their track record and customer satisfaction levels. In this post, we will examine A.N.Builders, a builder operating out of Tamil Nadu, and evaluate their performance based on the legal complications they’ve encountered.
A.N.Builders has faced a total of 2 complaints, with both of these cases resulting in losses. This raises important questions for potential buyers regarding the reliability and customer service standards of the builder.
The legal landscape for A.N.Builders is revealing:
Based on the data, A.N.Builders has a troubling track record concerning customer disputes. With no cases won and an inability to fulfill commitments related to security features, potential buyers may need to proceed with caution.
In conclusion, while A.N.Builders has established a presence in Tamil Nadu, the absence of successful legal outcomes raises concerns that potential homeowners should seriously consider. Due diligence and thorough research are key in securing a reliable builder for your investment.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against A.N. Builders, which it lost, revealed several key insights across the board. The primary theme emerging from these cases is related to CCTV surveillance disputes.
The builder faced multiple lawsuits regarding their failure to provide necessary details for the CCTV surveillance system, specifically the IP address and password. In each case, the appellants sought relief that would allow them to access or install a separate CCTV system to ensure their security and privacy. The common trigger in these cases was the builder's inability or unwillingness to fulfill their commitments regarding CCTV access, which reflects a broader pattern of non-compliance with contractual obligations related to security provisions.
The reasons people brought these cases to court primarily revolved around the builder’s failure to deliver promised services that are crucial for the safety and security of homeowners. The verdicts consistently favored the appellants, allowing them to install their own CCTV surveillance systems at their expense, which underscores a significant shortcoming in the builder's service delivery and accountability.
A.N. Builders lost these cases mainly due to their inability to honor their commitments. The common factors leading to their losses include:
Overall, these cases shine a spotlight on the builder's unfulfilled promises regarding security measures, leading to a lack of trust from homeowners and legal consequences accordingly.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Appeal No.1 of 2022 | Tamil Nadu | The appellants sought relief regarding CCTV surve… | ["CCTV surveillance… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellants sought relief… | G.Premalatha | A.N.Builders | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1OnTEzj9UD1pucWjd6LxV56avF1FZFocE |