CIN | U45201TN2004PTC054196 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | NO.35-A, ANDAVAR SHRISTIPILLAYAR KOIL STREET RAJAJI NAGAR , CHENNAI 600041, Tamil Nadu, India - 000000 |
Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Andavar Home Creators Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key patterns underlying the disputes. The cases highlight key issues in the builder's dealings, particularly concerning registration of property, payment acknowledgments, and the builder’s relationships with landowners.
The first theme, "Registration Delays and Disputes," reflects a troubling trend where buyers report that the builder failed to register the undivided share of land and construction agreements despite receiving full payment. This suggests a significant operational lapse on the part of the builder, which could stem from either mismanagement or willful non-compliance with regulatory requirements.
"Payment Disputes and Accountability" is another critical theme, with the builder often countering buyer claims by asserting that payments were incomplete. However, the TNRERA's decision to direct landowners to execute sale deeds in favor of buyers indicates that builders' claims of underpayment may not be substantiated, leading to questions of accountability and transparent payment tracking.
Lastly, "Cooperation Issues with Land Owners" is a recurring theme, where builders often blame non-cooperative landowners for their inability to fulfill agreements. While it’s plausible that some landowners might be obstructive, this defense consistently arises in cases involving this builder, implying potential issues in the builder's approach to stakeholder management or contract negotiation.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases include buyer frustration over the lack of registration and incomplete transactions, as well as disputes over payment settlements. The builder's consistent reliance on counterclaims of underpayment and uncooperative landowners indicates a defensive posture that has not been effective in court, suggesting that their operational practices or customer service may not align with regulatory expectations or buyer satisfaction.
The builder’s losses in these cases can be attributed to several factors, including insufficient evidence to support their payment claims, a failure to execute required legal registrations, and an inability to compel landowner cooperation. Together, these factors paint a picture of a builder that may not have the best track record in fulfilling commitments to its clients, which should be taken into account by prospective buyers.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!