ANGEL INFA PARTNERSHIP FIRM

Introduction

In the world of real estate, selecting the right builder is a crucial step in ensuring a smooth home buying experience. Today, we delve into Angel Infa Partnership Firm, analyzing their track record and legal encounters to assist potential buyers in making informed decisions.

Overview of Angel Infa Partnership Firm

• Name: Angel Infa Partnership Firm
• Number of Complaints: 1
• Cases Won: 0
• Cases Lost: 1
• States with Projects: Gujarat

Legal Case Insights

Case Analysis

Angel Infa Partnership Firm has a notable history concerning legal disputes. They have faced a total of 1 complaint which culminated in a case loss. The details of this legal encounter are as follows:

1. Case Lost:
   • Summary: The appellant alleged that the respondent (Angel Infa) failed to submit their quarterly report for the project 'Angel Bliss' promptly, contrary to the stipulations of the RERA Act and Rules. The Firm, however, claimed that the delay was caused due to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.
   • Verdict: The authority ruled in favor of the appellant, imposing a fine of Rs. 30,000 on the builder, mandating them to file the quarterly report on the RERA portal.

Patterns and Common Factors

Lost Case Patterns

The case that Angel Infa Partnership Firm lost showcases a pattern often seen in legal disputes where compliance with regulatory deadlines is critical. The primary factors identified include:

1. Regulatory Compliance: Failure to adhere to stipulated reporting guidelines led to penalization.
2. Pandemic Implications: The builder's defense hinged on external factors (COVID-19) impacting operational capabilities, though this was insufficient to avert legal consequences.

Won Case Evaluation

Interestingly, it should be noted that although there was one instance of a case loss, the data indicates that the Firm did not secure wins in other disputes, leading to an overall record that may raise concerns about reliability in handling projects.

Conclusion

In summary, Angel Infa Partnership Firm presents a cautionary tale in the landscape of real estate. With a record of one complaint and a loss acknowledging inadequate compliance, potential buyers should evaluate this builder with care.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Due Diligence: Investigate the builder's history for complaints and case outcomes.
2. References and Reviews: Seek feedback from previous buyers about their experiences with Angel Infa Partnership Firm, particularly concerning project timelines and delivery.
3. Legal Advice: Consider consulting a legal expert to understand any binding agreements before making a purchase, based on the builder's compliance track record.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

• Experience Matters: Opt for builders with a solid reputation and a proven track record in successfully completing projects.
• Transparency: Look for builders who maintain open communication, provide clear timelines, and are responsive to buyer inquiries.
• Regulatory Knowledge: A builder aware of and compliant with local regulations is less likely to face legal disputes in the future, providing more stability in buyer confidence.

In conclusion, while Angel Infa Partnership Firm operates within Gujarat, concerned buyers should weigh the aforementioned factors carefully before engagement.

Analysis of the cases filed against Angel Infa Partnership Firm, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across their disputes. The cases highlight key issues primarily revolving around non-compliance with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) Act and Rules, penalties incurred due to project delays, and disputes over the builder's reporting obligations.

The first type of case involves non-compliance with RERA Act and Rules. In one notable instance, the builder failed to submit a quarterly report for their project 'Angel Bliss' as required by the provisions of the RERA Act. The builder defended this action by attributing the delay to the COVID-19 pandemic; however, this reason did not resonate with the authority, which imposed a fine of Rs. 30,000 and directed the builder to fulfill their reporting obligations promptly.

A common thread among these cases is the penalties for project delays. Builders are expected to adhere to timelines and deadlines, both for completing projects and for maintaining regulatory compliance. When these expectations are not met, authorities often impose penalties, as seen in the case above.

The builder's reporting obligations were frequently disputed, leading to legal actions. The requirement for timely quarterly reports is crucial for transparency and for allowing prospective buyers to make informed decisions. The builder's failure to comply with this requirement reflects a broader pattern of neglecting regulatory duties, which undermines trust in their operations.

The reasons people brought cases against the builder primarily revolved around contesting these penalties and the builder's attempts to justify delays attributed to external factors. The patterns emerging from these summaries indicate that the builder faced scrutiny for repeatedly failing to meet regulatory standards and for facing a lack of accountability in their operations.

Ultimately, the builder lost these cases due to insufficient evidence to support their claims of extenuating circumstances, along with a clear non-compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The builder's failure to adhere to established rules and to fulfill their obligations led to legal consequences, highlighting the importance of transparency and compliance in the real estate sector.