ANGEL REAL BUILD INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

Evaluating Angel Real Build India Private Limited: A Deep Dive

When considering a property investment, selecting the right builder is paramount. One such player in the Indian real estate market is Angel Real Build India Private Limited. Here, we will delve into their operations, particularly analyzing their legal track record and what it could mean for prospective buyers.

Overview of Legal Cases

Angel Real Build India Private Limited has faced two legal complaints, both of which resulted in losses for the builder. This pattern of litigation raises concerns about their operational practices and customer satisfaction.

Summary of Legal Cases

1. First Case:
   • Appellant Claim: The applicant alleged that the builder failed to provide the original satisfaction of the registered sale letter while requesting early payment.
   • Respondent Claim: The builder countered that there was no dispute, asserting that the applicant voluntarily submitted their application.
   • Final Verdict: The case concluded due to mutual agreement, resulting in the applicant withdrawing their case, demonstrating a resolution without any acknowledgment of fault from the builder.
2. Second Case:
   • Appellant Claim: The applicant contended that the builder had not paid the remaining consideration for a flat.
   • Respondent Claim: The builder again claimed that all issues had been settled and that the applicant showed no desire to pursue the case further.
   • Final Verdict: The application was closed with the case being settled without conditions, implying a lack of accountability.

Patterns in Legal Outcomes

Lost Cases

The common factors in the two lost cases include:

• Lack of Documentation: The builder was accused of not providing essential documents, like the satisfaction of the registered sale letter.
• Settlements: Both cases concluded with mutual agreements rather than a judgment in favor of the builder, which suggests a potential tendency towards resolving disputes quietly without admitting liability.
• Applicant Withdrawal: In both cases, the applicants only withdrew their claims, indicating that the issues might have remained unresolved at the builder's end despite the settlements.

Cases Won

Currently, Angel Real Build India Private Limited has no won cases to analyze.

Conclusion

From the observations, Angel Real Build India Private Limited has faced challenges in upholding its commitments and has a history of unresolved disputes, which leads to an overall cautious assessment of their reliability as a builder.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Due Diligence: Investigate legal histories and complaint records thoroughly before deciding to engage with this builder. The current data indicates a need for caution.
• Request Documentation: Ensure all agreements are documented clearly, including payment agreements and completion timelines, to protect yourself.
• Seek References: Look for feedback from previous buyers to get firsthand insights into their experiences to assess the level of satisfaction and service provided by the builder.

General Tips When Selecting Any Builder

1. Research: Always look for a builder with a sound track record of completed projects and satisfied customers.
2. Legal Check: Verify any past legal disputes and their outcomes as an indicator of possible future interactions.
3. Transparency: Look for builders who are open about their operations and documentation practices; transparency is key.
4. Quality of Work: Explore their completed projects for the quality of construction and adherence to timelines.

In conclusion, while Angel Real Build India Private Limited operates in Madhya Pradesh, potential buyers should proceed with caution and conduct thorough due diligence before entering into any purchase agreements.

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Angel Real Build India Private Limited, which it lost, reveals key insights into its legal disputes and the underlying issues.

The cases primarily revolve around two common themes: dispute resolution through mutual agreement and the settlement of financial obligations. In both instances, the disputes were characterized by the builder's claims regarding the non-fulfillment of contractual agreements by the respondents, particularly concerning payments and documentation.

For instance, in the first case, the builder alleged that the respondent had failed to provide the original satisfaction of a registered sale letter, seeking early payment. In response, the respondent indicated that the matter was amicably settled and that the builder had voluntarily submitted their application, leading to a mutual agreement that resulted in the withdrawal of the case. Similarly, in another instance, the builder claimed that the respondent had not paid the remaining consideration for a flat, but the respondent countered by stating that the agreement had been fully settled and that the builder chose not to pursue the case further. This indicates a pattern where the builder often approached the court alleging financial disputes which were eventually resolved outside of the court system.

Common reasons why the builder initiated these cases appear to be rooted in contesting alleged non-payments and seeking claims regarding contractual obligations. However, it is noteworthy that the builder also faced challenges in substantiating its claims, which is evident from its frequent withdrawals and the resolution of cases through agreements without conditions.

The reasons behind the builder's losses can often be traced back to insufficient evidence or the inability to convincingly argue their stance in the face of the respondents' assertions. For example, the builder's claim of seeking early payment lacked robust backing when juxtaposed against the respondents' positions, which emphasized voluntary submission and resolution—an indication that the builder may have struggled with legal compliance or misinterpretations of agreements.

Overall, these instances highlight a significant aspect of Angel Real Build India Private Limited's operational approach wherein disputes often led to mutual resolutions, reflecting a potential for better preemptive measures to avoid litigation in the future. Buyers considering dealing with this builder should be aware of these patterns and may want to inquire further into the terms and executed agreements to avoid similar disputes down the line.