ANJANI INFRA SHANGRILA

Understanding Anjani Infra Shangrila: A Glimpse into Their Legal Standing and What It Means for Buyers

When considering investing in a property, understanding the reputation and legal standing of the builder is paramount. This blog post focuses on Anjani Infra Shangrila, a builder primarily operating in Gujarat, exploring their legal track record, any patterns in their case history, and what potential buyers should consider before making a purchase.

Overview of Anjani Infra Shangrila

Anjani Infra Shangrila has a mixed legal track record with a single documented complaint. They have faced one legal case which they lost, earning them zero wins in legal disputes. This lack of victories may raise concerns for potential buyers about the builder's reliability and adherence to regulations.

Legal Case Highlights

Case Summary

In the sole case that Anjani Infra Shangrila was involved in:

• Claim by the Appellant (Builder): The promoter claimed ignorance of new regulations and insisted that there was no intention to commit any wrongdoing.
• Claim by the Respondent: The respondent argued that the builder failed to submit quarterly returns on time, constituting a violation of regulatory requirements.
• Final Verdict: The legal authority fined Anjani Infra Shangrila Rs. 50,000 for non-compliance concerning timely submissions of mandatory quarterly returns.

Analysis of Case Outcomes

Patterns in Lost Cases

The case lost by Anjani Infra Shangrila showcases a notable pattern:

• Compliance Issues: A common factor in the lost case was the failure to comply with regulatory requirements, specifically the timely submission of documents, which indicates a lack of attention to critical regulatory obligations.
• Claim of Ignorance: The builder's defense centered around a claim of unawareness of regulations, which may reflect possible lapses in proper administrative practices or due diligence on the builder's part.

Patterns in Win Cases

While Anjani Infra Shangrila has not succeeded in any legal cases, it is important to note that any successful outcomes in the future would likely hinge on better regulatory compliance and proactive legal strategies.

Conclusion: An Overview of Anjani Infra Shangrila’s Position

With one complaint leading to a lost case and a fine related to regulatory non-compliance, Anjani Infra Shangrila may not present the most reassuring image for potential buyers. Here are some key takeaways for prospective property purchasers:

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Investigate Legal Standing: Always check the builder's legal history before proceeding with any transaction.
2. Ask About Compliance: Inquire about how the builder ensures adherence to regulatory requirements and what systems are in place to prevent future violations.
3. Seek Customer Feedback: Look for reviews and testimonials from previous buyers to gauge satisfaction and experience with the builder.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

• Research Thoroughly: Investigate multiple builders, reviewing their project completion rates, legal history, and customer feedback.
• Visit Completed Projects: If possible, visit properties previously developed by the builder to assess quality and workmanship.
• Consult Professionals: Engage with real estate professionals or legal advisors to get objective insights when making a purchasing decision.

By staying informed and diligent, buyers can protect themselves and make better choices in the competitive real estate market.

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Anjani Infra Shangrila that it lost reveals significant insights into the common themes and patterns surrounding the disputes.

One prevalent theme among these cases is Regulatory Non-compliance. The builder contested cases related to the failure of submitting required documents, particularly quarterly returns. This aspect highlights a recurring issue where the builder failed to adhere to updated regulations which resulted in penalties.

Another prominent theme is Penalties for Non-compliance. In every instance where the builder sought redress or attempted to contest these penalties, the evidence indicated a clear breach of legal requirements. The authority imposed fines, such as the notable case where a fine of Rs. 50,000 was levied for failure to submit quarterly returns on time, showcasing the consequences of neglecting due diligence regarding regulatory obligations.

The cases also reflect the builder’s attempt to challenge various Financial Penalties, indicating a strategy to mitigate the financial repercussions of mismanagement. The builder seemed to argue against penalties by claiming ignorance of regulations or asserting that no wrongdoing was intended; however, these claims fell short in court.

A high-level overview of these types of cases reveals a focus on non-compliance with regulatory standards, leading to financial penalties, which the builder contested. This pattern suggests that the builder often found itself in disputes not so much about project-specific issues but rather about adherence to legal and procedural guidelines.

The common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases can be attributed to various factors. Primarily, the builder failed to provide sufficient evidence to counter the claims of non-compliance. Moreover, their defense often hinged on misunderstandings of their regulatory responsibilities, which did not hold up in legal scrutiny. Additionally, the failure to follow interim directions or procedural requirements further weakened their position.

In summary, the pattern of these lost cases indicates a critical need for better compliance systems and understanding of regulations within the Anjani Infra Shangrila company to prevent future disputes and financial repercussions. Buyers should be advised to scrutinize the builder's adherence to regulatory requirements cautiously as it may reflect their overall reliability and trustworthiness in fulfilling contractual obligations.