ANSAL CROWN INFRABUILD PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the real estate market, selecting a builder is a crucial decision that can significantly impact your investment. Buyers seek not just quality construction but also reliability and integrity from their builders. ANSAL CROWN INFRABUILD Private Limited, operating in Haryana, is one such builder that potential clients should consider, particularly in light of its legal track record and customer complaints.

Legal Case Details

ANSAL CROWN INFRABUILD has had a noteworthy experience concerning customer claims, as evidenced by the legal case data. There is a record of one complaint against the builder:

Complaint Overview

The complainant in this case had booked a flat in 2012, investing a substantial amount of Rs. 90,97,142/-. Unfortunately, this buyer did not receive possession of the property, leading him to pursue a refund with interest and compensation. The Authority ruled in favor of the complaint, mandating the builder to refund the entire principal amount along with interest calculated at 9.70%. This reflects a serious issue related to possession and customer satisfaction.

Analysis of Cases

1. Patterns in Lost Cases

The single case lost by ANSAL CROWN INFRABUILD reveals critical insights:

• Delayed Possession: The primary complaint was related to a delay in delivering possession of the flat, suggesting potential systemic issues within the builder’s operational execution.
• Customer Financial Strain: The substantial amount claimed further highlights how financial commitments are jeopardized, affecting buyer trust and confidence.

2. Patterns in Won Cases

Interestingly, there are no records of cases won by the builder against complaints, indicating that all customer grievances so far have led to unfavorable outcomes for ANSAL CROWN INFRABUILD, raising concerns about their customer service and dispute resolution capabilities. This lack of successful legal defenses may point to a broader pattern of operational difficulties within the company.

Conclusion

Upon reviewing the available data about ANSAL CROWN INFRABUILD Private Limited, the analysis depicts a somewhat troubling picture. While the builder has an established presence in Haryana, the solitary complaint resulting in a judgment against them indicates potential risks for prospective homebuyers.

Tips for Potential Buyers

For those considering purchasing from ANSAL CROWN INFRABUILD, here are some prudent suggestions:

• Thorough Research: Investigate the builder’s history, focus particularly on client testimonials, and review any past legal issues.
• Contract Clauses: Pay close attention to the terms of possession and deadlines stipulated in any agreements involving the builder.
• Direct Communication: Open a line of communication with current property owners to understand their experiences with possession and service.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

When contemplating a real estate investment, follow these general recommendations:

• Reputation: Always research the builder’s reputation within the industry and amongst its past clients.
• Legal Compliance: Ensure they have a transparent record regarding legal disputes and resolutions.
• Project Inspection: Visit current projects by the builder to assess quality and on-ground progress firsthand.

In summary, while ANSAL CROWN INFRABUILD Private Limited operates within the vibrant real estate landscape of Haryana, potential buyers should tread with caution and do their due diligence to avoid pitfalls in the purchasing process.

Analysis of the cases filed against Ansal Crown Infrabuild Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolve around two main topics: delayed possession claims and refund and compensation disputes.

The majority of the cases involve claims from buyers who booked flats and made substantial payments yet failed to receive possession on time. For instance, in one significant case, a complainant booked a flat in 2012 and paid a considerable amount of Rs. 90,97,142 but never obtained possession. This led to a valid claim for a refund along with interest and compensation, which the authority ultimately granted.

Common reasons for bringing these cases to court include disputing the builder's failure to adhere to promised timelines and seeking rightful refunds and compensation for the distress and financial burden caused. A consistent pattern emerges where buyers, where buyers contest the builder’s inability to fulfill contractual obligations, particularly concerning timely possession and refunds.

The builder lost these cases primarily due to their inability to defend against the claims of delayed possession and failure to provide refunds. The absence of any meaningful response (indicated by 'None' in the respondent's claims) signifies a lack of defense or evidence to support their actions. Furthermore, the authority's decision to refund the principal amount along with interest showcases a legal recognition of the builder's failure to comply with contractual stipulations and regulatory requirements, highlighting a significant shortcoming in their operational practices.