| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the competitive landscape of real estate, selecting a reliable builder is crucial for ensuring a satisfactory purchase experience. Ansal Housing, a prominent name in the industry, has had its share of successes and challenges, evident from the numerous legal cases brought against it. This blog post delves into the complexities of Ansal Housing's legal landscape, analyzing the patterns in the cases it has faced and won, and providing valuable insights for potential buyers.
Overview of Ansal Housing
- Number of Complaints: 228
- Cases Won: 28
- Cases Lost: 200
- States with Projects: Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab
Ansal Housing operates across several states, which reflects its expansive portfolio. However, with a significantly higher number of vocal complaints and legal challenges, there is much to analyze regarding its performance in the legal domain.
Legal Challenges Faced by Ansal Housing
Patterns in Lost Cases
Ansal Housing has lost a staggering 200 cases, …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Ansal Housing, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common themes and disputes surrounding their projects. The cases can be broadly categorized into several types, including delayed possession claims, refund and compensation disputes, force majeure and unforeseen circumstances, non-compliance with regulatory requirements, and penalties for project delays.
The majority of the cases revolved around delayed possession claims, where buyers sought relief for the builder's failure to deliver units within the stipulated timelines. These claims often cited reasons like force majeure circumstances, orders from various courts, and the National Green Tribunal, which the builder claimed were beyond their control. However, the authorities consistently ruled in favor of the buyers, indicating a pattern where the builder's defenses based on unforeseen circumstances were not accepted.
Refund and compensation disputes were another frequent theme. Buyers who had made substantial payments towards their units sought refunds due …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Ansal Housing, which it lost, reveals a pattern of recurring themes that center primarily around regulatory compliance, financial commitments, and procedural observances.
In terms of non-compliance with regulatory provisions, it is evident that many cases stemmed from the builder's failure to adhere to the mandatory provisions of pre-deposit outlined in the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. The builder often claimed that they had complied with the Act, yet the respondents consistently asserted otherwise, leading to dismissals based on the lack of necessary financial securities. This theme highlights a critical area where the builder's assertions did not align with legal expectations, resulting in unfavorable outcomes.
Another theme revolves around disputes over pre-deposit requirements, with case after case demonstrating the importance of this provision in the appeal process. The consistent dismissal of appeals on these grounds indicates a systematic …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Ansal Housing, which it won, revealed the following information.
The cases brought forth by Ansal Housing have revolved around several key themes, primarily focusing on the legality of orders that struck off the builder's defence, disputes related to compliance with legal directions, and issues regarding the withdrawal of appeals and settlement of disputes related to charges. These recurring topics indicate a complex interplay between the builder's operational compliance and the legal environment within which it operates.
Looking more closely, many of the disputes involve the striking off of the builder's defence due to claims of non-compliance with directions issued in previous orders. This suggests a contentious dynamic wherein procedural requirements play a critical role in litigation outcomes. Common themes such as 'Non-compliance with Directions' and 'Striking Off Defence Claims' highlight a litigation trend where the builder consistently contests the legality of …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder Ansal Housing, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The disputes emerged around several key themes:
- Non-compliance with Legal Provisions: Some cases arose where the appellants claimed they were unable to meet the requirements under specific legal sections, notably Section 43(5) of the Act. The builder successfully defended against these claims by demonstrating non-compliance on the part of the complainants.
- Settlement Disputes: Several complaints were dismissed based on the existence of settlement deeds or agreements, with the authority ruling that the matters had been settled amicably. This indicates frequent reliance on settlements in disputes involving Ansal Housing.
- Claims of Unfulfilled Agreements: There were multiple instances where complainants alleged that terms of agreements or settlement contracts had not been fulfilled. However, the builder successfully argued that the authority was not empowered to revisit …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!