CIN | L45201DL1983PLC016821 |
---|---|
Year Established | 22-Oct-83 |
Address | 606, 6th Floor, Indra Prakash 21, Barakhamba Road, , New Delhi, Delhi, India - 110001 |
Company Status | Public |
When considering real estate investments, understanding the reputation and legal standing of builders is crucial. In this article, we delve into ANSAL HOUSING LIMITED, examining their legal history, the nature of complaints against them, and what potential buyers should know.
ANSAL HOUSING LIMITED has a notable track record with a total of 16 complaints lodged against them. Among these complaints, the builder experienced a challenging outcome, winning only 2 cases while losing 14. This discrepancy calls for a closer look at the nature of these legal disputes.
The 2 cases that ANSAL HOUSING LIMITED lost were dismissed due to the non-appearance of the complainants. This pattern suggests that while the complaints were valid concerns in the eyes of the justice system, the failure of complainants to appear likely hindered the resolution process ultimately leading to the dismissal of these cases. Without the participation of the complainants, the court had little option but to dismiss the cases in default, rendering it unclear whether the builder’s actions or circumstances led to these complaints initially.
In contrast, ANSAL HOUSING LIMITED won 14 cases, primarily revolving around claims of delays in possession of units. Complainants sought compensation for these delays; however, the builder argued that the setbacks were due to unforeseen circumstances. Interestingly, the authority allowed delay possession charges from the due date of possession to the actual possession handover, indicating that the courts recognized circumstances beyond the builder’s control, which could reflect a need for better communication with customers regarding potential delays. Additionally, many of the complaints resulted in amicable settlements between parties, highlighting a trend towards negotiation rather than litigation.
ANSAL HOUSING LIMITED presents a mixed legal record characterized by numerous complaints. The builder has shown a propensity to win many cases, particularly focusing on delays in possession, and has often opted for settlements. However, the number of cases lost, particularly those dismissed due to complainants' non-appearance, suggests a potential area for improvement in customer engagement and communication.
In summary, while ANSAL HOUSING LIMITED does have a significant number of complaints and losses, there are patterns that highlight their willingness to settle amicably with buyers. Potential investors should weigh these findings carefully as they consider engaging in real estate transactions with the builder.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Ansal Housing Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key insights into the nature of the disputes faced by the company. The cases can be broadly categorized into two main themes: Delayed Possession Claims and Settlement Agreements.
The majority of the cases revolved around delayed possession claims, where the complainants sought compensation for the builder's failure to deliver units on time. The builder consistently attributed these delays to unforeseen circumstances, but the authorities ruled in favor of the complainants, awarding them compensation from the due date of possession until the actual handover of the units. This pattern suggests that one of the primary triggers for litigation in these cases was the builder's inability to meet project timelines, leading to dissatisfaction among buyers.
Another significant theme emerged in the form of settlement agreements. In numerous cases, the parties reached an amicable settlement before the authorities made a ruling. While specific details of the claims and counterclaims were not provided in these instances, the frequent reliance on settlement agreements indicates that the builder may have preferred to negotiate rather than contest claims in an protracted legal battle.
The common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases include the failure to fulfill contractual obligations regarding timely possession delivery. Although the builder often cited unforeseen circumstances, the authorities apparently did not accept this defense, emphasizing the importance of meeting deadlines in real estate transactions.
Overall, this analysis highlights the challenges Ansal Housing Limited has faced, particularly concerning timely project delivery. It serves as a cautionary tale for potential buyers, who should be aware of these issues before making purchasing decisions.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CR/1620/2022 | Haryana | The complaint was disposed off due to a settlemen… | ["Settlement Agreem… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Priyanka Rath | ANSAL HOUSING LIMIT… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTIyMzU1 |
CR/5631/2022 | Haryana | Unnikrishnan Nair and Anand Nair and Ritu Nair vs… | ["Settlement"] | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Ritu Nair | ANSAL HOUSING LIMIT… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTIyMzU5 |
CR/1621/2022 | Haryana | The complaint was settled between the parties ami… | ["Settlement Agreem… | {"appellant_claim(in detail)": "Not provided", "r… | Anita Sahdey | ANSAL HOUSING LIMIT… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTIyMzU2 |
CR/1 | Haryana | The matter has been settled between the parties a… | ["Settlement Agreem… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Sweta Sharma | ANSAL HOUSING LIMIT… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTIyMzU4 |
CR/1618/2022 | Haryana | The matter has been settled between the parties a… | ["Settlement Agreem… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Minal Sethi | ANSAL HOUSING LIMIT… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTIyMzU3 |
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, ANSAL HOUSING LIMITED, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases predominantly centered around default dismissals, primarily due to the non-appearance of the complainant during the proceedings. In both noted instances, the complaints were dismissed in default, highlighting that the opposing parties failed to present their claims effectively.
The reasons for these cases being filed are not detailed, but one can infer that they may have involved disputes over project execution, expectations regarding delivery timelines, or other disagreements. Common patterns in complaints might include contesting penalties, claims of project delays, or misunderstandings related to contractual obligations. However, in this case, all proceedings ended without the court delving into the merits of the complaints due to the non-appearance of the opposing party.
The primary reason for ANSAL HOUSING LIMITED's success in these cases is the evident failure of the complainants to provide sufficient evidence and to comply with legal procedures. Without a compelling case presented to the court, the builder was able to defend itself effectively. This also suggests that in situations where buyers or regulatory bodies feel aggrieved, they must be thorough and prepared to substantiate their claims assertively.
This reflection on the builder's legal outcomes portrays a narrative of a company that maintains a strong stance against potentially unjust claims. It is not uncommon in the real estate market for buyers to make accusations based on expectations or misunderstandings, leading to legal disputes. ANSAL HOUSING LIMITED's ability to navigate these challenges might indicate a robust internal process for managing projects and addressing customer concerns.
To potential buyers, this analysis underscores the importance of making informed decisions before investing in real estate. While legitimate disputes do exist in this sector, understanding a builder's track record—like that of ANSAL HOUSING LIMITED—can reveal their competencies and response strategies. Buyers should approach claims with caution, ensuring they rely on reliable information and analyses before forming opinions on a builder's reputation.
This dictionary structure encapsulates the recurring themes in the disputes and provides a detailed overview that potential buyers can consider when evaluating the builder's reputation and performance in legal matters.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CR/2010/2021 | Haryana | Complaint dismissed in default for non-appearance… | ["Non-appearance of… | {"appellant_claim(in detail)": "Not provided", "r… | SUHASINI ARYA | ANSAL HOUSING LIMIT… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTQwMTc4 |
CR/7407/2022 | Haryana | Complaint filed by Shaik Siraj Chaudhry against A… | ["Default dismissal… | {"appellant_claim(in detail)": "Not provided", "r… | Shaik Siraj Chaudhry | ANSAL HOUSING LIMIT… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTYzODgy |