ANTEVORTA DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the competitive real estate market, choosing the right builder is crucial for securing your investment and ensuring peace of mind throughout the property acquisition process. ANTEVORTA DEVELOPERS Private Limited has been a prominent player in this space, particularly in Karnataka. However, with 52 complaints lodged against them, and a substantial number of cases won and lost, potential buyers need to delve deeper into the builder's legal track record before making a decision.

Overview of Legal Challenges

According to the provided data, ANTEVORTA DEVELOPERS has faced a notable 52 complaints. Of these, they have lost 33 cases while winning 19. Let’s analyze these cases to understand the underlying patterns:

Cases Lost

• Common Claims by Appellants: Many complaints involved claims of delay in project completion, wherein complainants sought either refunds or compensation for interest on amounts paid. This theme was prevalent across multiple cases, indicating dissatisfaction regarding …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Antevorta Developers Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into common themes, each highlighting a unique aspect of the builder's litigation history.

One of the most prevalent themes is Delayed Possession Claims. In numerous cases, the plaintiffs claimed that the builder had failed to deliver possession of their flats within the stipulated time. This theme overlaps with Refund Claims Due to Incomplete Projects, as many plaintiffs sought refunds along with interest due to the delays. The builder's consistent defense in these cases was that there was no delay or that the plaintiffs had not adhered to the payment schedule, indicating a systemic issue in communication or project management.

Amenities and Interest Disputes also stand out, with plaintiffs often claiming that they were charged interest unfairly or that the …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, ANTEVORTA DEVELOPERS Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases can be grouped under several recurring themes, reflecting the primary types of disputes that arose between the builder and the complainants.

1. Delayed Possession Claims: Many complaints centered around allegations of delayed possession of apartments. In these cases, the builder consistently defended itself by demonstrating that there was no delay in possession, often due to unpaid dues from buyers or completion within the stipulated time.
2. Refund Claims for Non-existent Projects: Several cases involved claims for refunds related to supposed projects that did not exist, with the builder successfully arguing that the complainants were not clients of any such project, thus dismissing the complaints as not maintainable. This indicates a significant misunderstanding on the purchasers' part.
3. Claims of Project Incompletion: Disputes also occurred over claims of construction delays. In …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis