A.P. REAL ESTATE
- No of Complaints: 2
- States (Active in): National Capital Territory Of Delhi
| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
When engaging in real estate transactions, choosing a reliable builder is paramount to ensuring a smooth experience and safeguarding one's investment. In this post, we turn our attention to A.P. Real Estate, a builder operating in the National Capital Territory of Delhi. By diving into the complaints and legal cases involving this builder, we aim to provide potential buyers with insights to inform their decision-making process.
Overview of A.P. Real Estate
A.P. Real Estate has received a total of 2 complaints to date. Notably, it has a concerning record of legal disputes, having lost both cases brought against it without achieving a single victory.
Legal Case Details
The two cases filed against A.P. Real Estate revealed interesting patterns:
- Claims and Resolutions: In both cases, the complainants claimed that the matter had been settled amicably. This indicates a potential focus on out-of-court settlements or an attempt by both parties to resolve issues without further escalation.
- Final Verdicts: Both cases were dismissed as withdrawn, illustrating that the complaints were not pursued to conclusion, possibly due to the amicable settlement claims.
These outcomes suggest a tendency among complainants to seek resolution rather than engage in prolonged legal battles, although it does not absolve the builder from scrutiny over its practices.
Analysis of Complaints
Cases Lost
- Common Factors: The primary pattern in the cases lost by A.P. Real Estate revolves around claims of amicable settlement. This raises questions about the factors leading to dissatisfaction which necessitated the complaints in the first place. Without further details, the specific grievances remain unclear, but the tendency to seek out settlements suggests the presence of unresolved issues at the core of these disputes.
Cases Won
- Common Factors: There are no instances of A.P. Real Estate winning any cases outright, which highlights a troubling aspect of their legal standing. While the cases were dismissed due to claims of settlements, having no victories could reflect challenges in maintaining compliance with buyer expectations or contractual obligations.
Conclusion
In summary, while A.P. Real Estate operates within the National Capital Territory of Delhi, its track record regarding complaints and legal disputes raises concerns. The unanimous dismissal of cases suggests a pattern of unresolved issues rather than a denial of wrongdoing.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Do Your Research: Investigate the builder’s reputation beyond available data. Look for reviews and testimonials from previous clients.
- Request Documentation: Ensure you have all necessary agreements documented and understand your rights as a buyer.
- Clarify Settlement Processes: Be aware of how disputes are typically resolved by the builder. An emphasis on amicable settlements should not overshadow the importance of quality service and accountability.
- Ask Direct Questions: When engaging with A.P. Real Estate, inquire about their dispute resolution protocols and any previous complaints or issues raised by other buyers.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Check Licensing and Credentials: Always confirm that the builder is licensed and meets all regulatory requirements for your area.
- Review Previous Projects: Examine completed projects for quality and timely delivery.
- Get References: Ask for referrals from past clients to ascertain the builder’s reliability.
- Investigate Financial Health: A financially stable builder is less likely to face disruptions that could impact your investment.
By keeping these considerations in mind, potential buyers can navigate the process more confidently and make informed decisions regarding their investments in real estate.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against A.P. Real Estate, where the builder lost, reveals several key points of interest. The cases highlight a recurring theme surrounding amicable settlement claims, where the complainant asserted that the matter had been settled peacefully with the builder. However, despite the lack of claims presented by the builder, the complaints ultimately ended in dismissal, citing withdrawal due to the aforementioned settlements.
The primary reason contributing to the builder’s litigation in these cases seems to stem from a failure to formalize agreements reached during mediation or negotiation phases. It is evident that parties involved in legal disputes with A.P. Real Estate often found themselves in court primarily to contest the existence or terms of these settlements, rather than issues like delays or regulatory non-compliance which are common in real estate disputes.
A pattern emerges where the builder’s cases typically ended without escalated arguments or counter-claims, signaling a potential issue with their documentation or communication practices regarding dispute resolutions. The common factor in the builder’s losses appears to be the recognition of amicable settlements by the legal framework, which raises a critical point: A.P. Real Estate might have benefited from ensuring that all agreements were documented thoroughly and accepted in writing by all parties involved, a practice that could mitigate future legal challenges.
Overall, while the cases against A.P. Real Estate were resolved without highlighting severe infractions or ongoing disputes, they illustrate an important lesson for builders about the necessity for clear, documented agreements in dispute resolution.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comp. No.10/2020 | National Capital Te… | The complainant requested to withdraw the complai… | Withdrawal of compl… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | Mrs. Mona Khurana | A.P. Real Estates | https://rera.delhi.gov.in/sites/default/files/Comp%2010%20of%202020-Final%20Order%20dt%2014%20Oct%202020.pdf |