APEKSHA INFRAPROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

Apeksha Infraprojects Private Limited is a builder operating primarily in Rajasthan, with a mixed track record in legal disputes concerning their projects. This blog delves into the available data regarding their legal cases, outlining the builder’s performance and key insights for potential buyers.

Legal Case Overview

The builder has faced a total of two complaints, leading to two legal cases. Here’s a summary of their outcomes:

Cases Lost

1. Case Summary: The respondent claimed that the changes made in the sanctioned plan were internal modifications that did not need the competent authority's approval. The court found the respondent's claim to be valid, resulting in the case being dropped.
   • Key Takeaway: This case highlights the importance of complying with regulatory requirements regarding project plans. Builders must ensure that any modifications made fall within the permitted scope to avoid legal repercussions.

Cases Won

1. Case Summary: In the other case, …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Apeksha Infraprojects Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around delayed possession claims, penalties imposed for these delays, and disputes over the payment for and possession of properties.

The delayed possession claims formed a significant bulk of the cases, with complainants often alleging that the builder had failed to hand over possession within the agreed timeframe. For instance, in one prominent case, the complainant demanded interest for the delay after the builder had not provided possession as promised. The builder, on the other hand, contended that they had offered possession, but the complainant had not settled the outstanding amount. This pattern suggests a common trigger for litigation in this area: the failure to meet contractual obligations regarding timely possession.

Penalties for project delays were another recurring theme. Builders were not only held accountable for …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Apeksha Infraprojects Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes reflected a few recurring themes, primarily revolving around regulatory compliance and claims regarding changes in sanctioned plans.

The cases brought against the builder often involved claims related to regulatory compliance, where opposing parties contested the builder's adherence to sanctioned plans or municipal orders. Some cases revolved around internal changes made in the sanctioned plan, with disputes emerging as to whether such changes required additional approval from the competent authority.

In examining these disputes, some common reasons for bringing legal action against the builder became apparent. Claimants often sought to contest perceived penalties, raised issues about project delays, or disagreed with the builder's interpretation of land classification or regulatory requirements. A notable pattern emerged; these claims sometimes appeared to stem from misunderstandings or misinterpretations of existing regulations or …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis