CIN | U70101DL2005PLC142294 |
---|---|
Year Established | 7-Nov-05 |
Address | Flat No. 110, Pkt. A-3, Sector-7, Rohini Delhi North West DL 110085 IN |
Company Status | Public |
In a landscape where choosing the right builder can significantly impact your property investment, APEX BUILDTECH LIMITED stands out with some notable legal challenges. This blog post delves into the builder’s history, particularly focusing on their legal cases, to provide insights for potential buyers considering a partnership with them.
Name: APEX BUILDTECH LIMITED
Number of Complaints: 2
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 2
States with Projects: Haryana
APEX BUILDTECH LIMITED has faced a total of two legal cases, both of which ended unfavorably for the builder. The cases involved claims primarily centered around delays in possession and financial disputes related to property arrangements.
In the context provided, APEX BUILDTECH LIMITED did not win any cases; rather, all legal actions taken against them resulted in losses. Therefore, there are no patterns to be identified in cases won, highlighting a worrying trend for any potential buyer.
An overall assessment reveals that APEX BUILDTECH LIMITED has not been favorable in resolving disputes, with a 100% loss rate in the two documented cases. This raises red flags regarding the reliability and operational integrity of the builder. Potential buyers should be cautious and consider these legal outcomes when making their decisions.
By keeping these aspects in mind, you can navigate the property market more effectively and ensure a satisfactory purchase experience.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Apex Buildtech Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key issues in their legal disputes.
The cases can be broadly categorized into three main topics: Delayed Possession Claims, Payment Disputes and Refunds, and Cancellation of Allotment. The most prominent theme among these is the Delayed Possession Claims, wherein buyers sought possession of their flats, often alleging significant delays in the delivery of units. For instance, in one case, the complainant sought possession of a penthouse and alleged a lack of any agreement in place, leading to a request for a refund of Rs. 55 lakhs.
Payment Disputes and Refunds also stand out as a major theme. Buyers and the builder frequently found themselves at odds over payments made, with buyers seeking refunds due to delays or cancellations of their flats. The builder's defense often revolved around claims of non-payment from buyers, which led to counter-claims for cancellation of allotment. However, the authority typically sided with the buyers, as seen in the refund of Rs. 55 lakhs with interest in one significant case.
The Cancellation of Allotment theme primarily arose from the builder's claims of non-payment from buyers. The builder sought to cancel flats allotted to buyers on grounds of insufficient payment, which reflects an underlying issue of communication or adherence to payment schedules in the purchase agreements.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting delays in possession, disputing payment obligations, and disagreements over the terms of sale. Buyers were often triggered to take legal action when they felt their payments were not being acknowledged or their possession dates were continuously pushed back. The builder’s losses in these cases frequently stemmed from insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to communicate effectively with buyers regarding project updates and payment requirements, and a lack of compliance with the interim directions provided by authorities.
Overall, this analysis highlights the importance of clear communication and adherence to contractual obligations in real estate transactions. It also serves as a cautionary tale for buyers about the potential risks associated with delays and disputes in the sector, underscoring the need for thorough due diligence when engaging with builders such as Apex Buildtech Limited.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
62/2021 | Haryana | Complainant sought refund of Rs. 55 lakhs paid fo… | ["Refund for delaye… | {"appellant_claim": "Complainant alleged delay in… | Smt. Santosh Verma | Apex Buildtech Limi… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTQwNDkx |
1074/2021 | Haryana | Complainant seeks possession of flat, compensatio… | ["Possession of fla… | {"appellant_claim": "Complainant seeks possession… | Smt. Santosh Saroha | Apex Buildtech Limi… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTM5NzE0 |