| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
When it comes to real estate and property development, choosing the right builder can make all the difference for potential homeowners. Aquarius Infrastructure, a builder operating mainly in Gujarat, has made headlines due to its track record in managing legal complaints. This article delves into the builder's history of complaints, the outcomes of legal cases, patterns observed, and tips for prospective buyers.
Overview of Complaints Against Aquarius Infrastructure
Aquarius Infrastructure has faced a total of two significant complaints. These cases raise concerns regarding the delivery of promised amenities and project completion. Both cases resulted in losses for the builder, and the lack of any won cases adds a layer of caution for potential clients.
Legal Case Details
- First Case: The complainant alleged that the builder failed to deliver several crucial amenities that had been advertised in the project brochure, including:
- Clubhouse
- Gym
- Washroom
- Gazebos
- Swimming pool
- Garden
- Senior citizen sitting area
- Internal road with street lights
- Second Case: In another complaint regarding 'Lakeview Apartment,' details of the builder's response were not provided. The verdict included an amendment order and judgment but offered no win for Aquarius Infrastructure.
Patterns and Analysis
Cases Lost
- Both cases highlight a recurring issue with unmet promises regarding project amenities. The first case notably indicates that clients thoroughly expected a high-quality service as marketed but were left dissatisfied due to insufficient amenities.
- The RERA orders suggest a legal expectation on builders to fulfill developments, indicating that many consumers have similar grievances. This absence of satisfied consumers may imply systemic issues within the builder's operational methodologies.
Cases Won
- Notably, while Aquarius Infrastructure has not successfully won any cases, the responses in the first case showcase the builder’s attempt to shift blame back onto the complainants regarding non-payment. Despite this, they were specifically mandated by RERA to complete pending works, suggesting a persistent reputation of non-compliance.
- The lack of won cases may point to inadequate management of legal and customer service challenges faced by the company.
Conclusion
Aquarius Infrastructure presents a concerning picture for potential buyers based on the available data. The builder has faced multiple claims, all resulting in losses, and has been mandated to fulfill promises they have failed to meet in the past.Tips for Potential Buyers
- Conduct Thorough Research: Before purchasing, investigate the builder’s reputation by checking reviews and testimonials.
- Verify Legal Compliance: Ensure that the builder complies with RERA regulations and check for any existing legal complaints.
- Understand Project Deliverables: Scrutinize the project brochure and compare it against previously completed projects to gauge what amenities were delivered.
- Seek Professional Advice: Consider consulting real estate professionals or lawyers to discern any potential red flags.
General Tips for Builders Selection
- Look for transparency in project details and previous client feedback.
- Assess the builder's financial health and their history with RERA.
- Prioritize builders with a solid record of timely project completion and fulfilling promises.
In summary, while Aquarius Infrastructure has the potential to deliver attractive properties, the existing complaints and legal challenges suggest buyers should proceed with caution.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Aquarius Infrastructure, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common themes surrounding their disputes.
The cases can be broadly categorized into three topics: Amenities Not Provided, Project Completion Delays, and Maintenance Payment Disputes. The first type involves claims from complainants that the builder failed to deliver promised amenities, which is critical in real estate transactions where buyers rely on these provisions for their lifestyle and comfort. For instance, in one case, the complainant detailed a lengthy list of missing amenities, including a clubhouse, gym, washrooms, gazebos, a swimming pool, a garden, a senior citizen sitting area, and properly trimmed roads with streetlights.
The second theme, Project Completion Delays, overlaps somewhat with the first, as failure to provide amenities often coincides with delays in project completion. However, this category specifically highlights cases where the focus is on the timely delivery of the overall project or specific components thereof. In the context of Aquarius Infrastructure, we see an example where the builder was given a 90-day window by the RERA authority to complete the remaining works; failure to comply would result in a substantial financial penalty, indicating a serious concern about the builder's adherence to timelines.
Maintenance Payment Disputes represents the third theme, which typically involves the builder's claims of non-payment from buyers regarding maintenance fees. This theme often intersects with the other two, as builders may cite maintenance payment issues as a reason for delays or inability to provide promised amenities. In the case of Aquarius Infrastructure, the builder defended against the complainant's claims by arguing that they had not received maintenance payments, which highlights the tension that can exist in the relationship between builders and buyers over financial obligations.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting the quality of delivery, disputing responsibility for project delays, and disagreements over the promised vs. actual scope of amenities. Buyers often find themselves in court due to the failure of builders to meet expectations, particularly when it comes to providing essential amenities which form the basis of their purchasing decisions.
The builder’s losses in these cases can be attributed to several patterns, including insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to comply with regulatory requirements, and a lack of responsiveness to the rulings made by authorities overseeing real estate transactions. The consistent failure to deliver on promises and meet deadlines suggests systemic issues within the builder's operations, which could impact potential buyers' decisions regarding their projects.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/Vadodara/200527… | Gujarat | Complaint against Aquarius Infrastructure for pro… | ["Project dispute"] | {"appellant_claim": "Complaint against Aquarius I… | Mr. Nilesh Kumar Ha… | Aquarius Infrastruc… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1jXuGfdBdC9pvo8uOSDTUpJGPYy3F6rdS |
| CMP/VADODARA/210316… | Gujarat | The complainant, Sunil Vinodbhai Brahmbhatt, file… | ["Non-provision of … | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | Sunil Vinodbhai Bra… | Aquarius Infrastruc… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1UGnHTbCnFW1ikY71ALNsGvbJ24BzeoLN |