| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Understanding AR DEVELOPERS: A Case Study of Performance and Compliance
When it comes to selecting a trustworthy builder for your property investment, it's crucial to consider their track record and how they handle disputes. In this blog post, we will take an in-depth look at AR DEVELOPERS, a builder operating in Odisha. With a small number of complaints and a solid record of compliance in legal proceedings, AR DEVELOPERS provides an interesting case to analyze.
Overview of AR DEVELOPERS
AR DEVELOPERS operates in the state of Odisha and has encountered a limited number of legal challenges. Notably, the builder has faced one formal complaint, which ultimately resulted in a favorable outcome for them, having won the case. With no cases lost to date, their legal standing appears robust and commendable in the industry.
Legal Case Details
Overview of Complaints
AR DEVELOPERS has received a total of one complaint. This involved …
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, AR DEVELOPERS, which it won, revealed the following information.
The disputes can be grouped primarily into two themes: Regulatory Non-compliance and Dispute Over Reporting Requirements.
In the category of Regulatory Non-compliance, the key cases revolved around claims of violating the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA), particularly in relation to timely submissions of required documentation. The specific case summarized here involved the failure to file quarterly progress reports, which led to involvement from the ORERA (Odisha Real Estate Regulatory Authority).
AR DEVELOPERS commonly brought these cases to court to contest penalties imposed for perceived non-compliance. In the reported case, the builder claimed a lack of knowledge regarding the requirement for submission of quarterly progress reports, pointing out that it had no mala fide intentions. This suggests that misunderstandings or miscommunications regarding regulatory requirements were triggers for litigation.
The …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!