ARAVALI INFRA PROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

When it comes to investing in real estate, potential buyers must conduct thorough due diligence on builders to avoid future headaches. Aravali Infra Project Private Limited, operating primarily in Chhattisgarh, has faced a mix of legal challenges that may influence buyer decisions. In this blog post, we will dissect the complaints lodged against the builder, the outcomes of their legal battles, and what this means for you as a potential buyer.

Legal Overview

Aravali Infra Project Private Limited has registered a total of four complaints against them, resulting in one case won and three lost. Understanding these numbers can provide context to the builder’s reliability and professionalism.

Cases Lost

The one case that Aravali Infra lost involved an applicant who claimed he had paid the full amount for a property but had not received possession despite multiple requests. The builder countered that the applicant had failed to pay a loan installment on time and that possession was under the bank's jurisdiction. Ultimately, the authority rejected the applicant's claim because it was already under the competent court's jurisdiction.

• Possession Issues: The core issue in this case revolves around the delivery of possession despite claimed payments.
• Jurisdiction Complications: The involvement of multiple jurisdictions complicated the resolution of this dispute, suggesting potential pitfalls for buyers in similar situations.

Cases Won

Interestingly, Aravali Infra has had more success in the legal arena, winning three cases against various applicants. In these cases, the applicants alleged that the builder did not complete construction or deliver possession. However, the builder maintained that the applicants had not settled outstanding payments of approximately Rs. 4,08,796.

• Outstanding Payments: The recurring theme in these cases was the dispute over outstanding payments for completed work.
• Construction Delays: The cases pointed towards a potential issue with timely delivery and quality of construction, as possession was frequently a key point of contention.
• Compliance Orders: The authority imposed penalties on the builder for non-compliance with the terms, further indicating that enforcement mechanisms are in place but could lead to prolonged disputes.

Conclusion

Based on the available data, Aravali Infra Project Private Limited has exhibited a pattern of contested claims, particularly relating to possession and payment disputes. While the builder has succeeded in cases where payments were the main issue, the overall low win rate indicates a level of concern among clients. Potential buyers should proceed with caution.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Verify Payment Records: Ensure your financial transactions and contractual obligations are clearly documented to avoid disputes.
2. Understand Possession Terms: Before committing, ask about the expected timeline for possession and any conditions attached.
3. Seek Legal Advice: If you have concerns about a builder's track record, consult with a real estate attorney for guidance.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

• Research Thoroughly: Look into the builder’s history, read reviews, and gather feedback from past clients.
• Inspect Previous Projects: If possible, check the quality of constructions completed by the builder to gauge their reliability and quality.
• Ask About Legal Issues: Inquire if the builder has faced any legal disputes and how they were resolved, as this can provide insights into their business practices.

In conclusion, while Aravali Infra Project Private Limited may offer appealing projects, buyers should be aware of their legal history and approach with due diligence. Taking the time to research and verify can lead to more secure real estate investments.

Analysis of the cases filed against Aravali Infra Project Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolved around four topics: delayed possession claims, non-compliance with municipal orders, disputes over ownership and payment, and penalties for project delays.

The majority of the claims made by the applicants were centered around the builder's failure to complete construction work and hand over possession of commercial units. This points to a significant issue with project management and adherence to timelines, resulting in multiple delayed possession claims.

There were also recurring disputes over ownership, with the builder claiming that units had been handed over to applicants who failed to pay the remaining amounts owed. This indicates a potential miscommunication or misunderstanding about the terms of sale and the status of unit ownership.

The authority imposed penalties on the builder for non-compliance with previous orders, highlighting a concerning trend where the builder failed to acknowledge and adhere to regulatory requirements. The imposition of daily penalties showcases an attempt by the governing bodies to enforce compliance and expedite delayed projects.

Common reasons for the builder’s losses in these cases include insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to complete promised works, and a lack of adherence to authority decisions. The consistent failure to meet deadlines and fulfill commitments suggests systemic issues within the company's operational framework.

Overall, these case summaries underline the importance for potential buyers to conduct thorough research into a builder's reputation, track record, and previous legal disputes before making any investment decisions. They should be wary of builders with a history of delayed projects and non-compliance, as these factors could lead to significant losses and prolonged waiting periods for unit possession.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Aravali Infra Project Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily fall under three key themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Payment Disputes, and Jurisdictional Issues.

1. Delayed Possession Claims: Several cases involved claims from applicants who insisted they had paid their dues but had not received possession of their property. This theme highlights the frequent frustration buyers face regarding the timely delivery of homes.
2. Payment Disputes: Another common theme was disputes centered around the timely payment of dues. In one notable case, the builder defended itself by asserting that the applicant had failed to make timely loan installments, directly affecting possession rights, which linked financial compliance to ownership.
3. Jurisdictional Issues: The builder often cited that certain cases were already under consideration in competent courts, indicating a strategy to challenge the relevance or appropriateness of the claims, thus underscoring the importance of following legal protocols.

The reasons these cases were brought to court often stemmed from buyers contesting penalties that arose from perceived project delays or disputes over the payment responsibility. A patterns emerged showing that buyers frequently file complaints when they feel their financial investments are not acknowledged or when they believe their rights are being infringed upon, leading them to seek redress in court.

Typically, the builder won these cases due to insufficient evidence from the opposing party regarding their claims. In some situations, the builder effectively demonstrated compliance with legal requirements, or highlighted misunderstandings in the contractual obligations between the parties involved. This suggests that, in several cases, claims made by buyers were either unsubstantiated or exaggerated, which the builder successfully countered.

The outcomes of these cases reflect positively on Aravali Infra Project Private Limited’s reputation, signaling that even in a market rife with disputes, the builder maintains a strong track record. The prevalence of unjust claims against builders is noteworthy, as it points to potential misunderstandings among buyers regarding the complex nature of real estate agreements.

For potential buyers, it's crucial to approach this landscape with caution. While there are certainly legitimate concerns in the real estate market, as indicated by the analysis of these cases, builders like Aravali Infra Project Private Limited often succeed in defending against wrongful accusations. Therefore, buyers should prioritize gathering comprehensive and reliable information before drawing conclusions about a builder's integrity. Making informed decisions remains paramount in navigating any potential pitfalls in real estate transactions.

This dictionary provides a structured overview of the analysis based on the provided summaries and encapsulates key themes, their implications, and valuable advice for potential buyers.