No Logo Available

ARG DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED

4.9/5 (1561 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Rajasthan
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

ARG Developers Private Limited is a notable player in the real estate industry, specifically operating in Rajasthan. However, alongside its projects, there have been numerous legal issues involving various complaints and court cases. This blog post analyzes the company's complaint history, focusing on the number and types of cases lost and won, looking for patterns that may influence potential buyers' decisions.

Complaint Overview

The builder has faced a significant number of complaints: 1,561 as per the available data. Out of these complaints, ARG Developers won 1,397 cases, while losing 164. This indicates a predominantly favorable outcome for the builder in legal matters, suggesting that they defend against complaints effectively.

Cases Lost: Patterns and Common Factors

In the 1,396 cases where ARG Developers lost, several patterns seem to emerge:

  1. Settlement Agreements: A large proportion of the cases were resolved through settlement agreements. Many cases were dismissed as withdrawn after settlements …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Refund and Interest Disputes Project Completion Delays Settlements and Withdrawals Regulatory Compliance Issues

Analysis of the cases filed against ARG Developers Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common themes and disputes associated with their projects.

The cases can be broadly categorized into several types, including delayed possession claims, refund and interest disputes, project completion delays, settlements and withdrawals, and regulatory compliance issues. Each of these categories highlights the challenges faced by buyers in dealing with ARG Developers.

Delayed possession claims were among the most frequent, with multiple complainants alleging that the builder failed to deliver units within the promised timelines. This led to claims for compensation for the delay, interest on loans, and rent paid during the waiting period. The builder's defense often revolved around the COVID-19 pandemic and other unforeseen circumstances, but the verdicts generally favored the complainants, emphasizing the need for builders to meet their commitments.

Refund and interest disputes also stood out, …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Errors in RERA Decisions Amendment Requests Improper Hearing Procedures

Analysis of the cases filed by the builder ARG Developers Private Limited, which it lost, reveals key insights into their litigation strategies and the challenges they faced in the legal arena.

The disputes can be categorized into a few prevalent themes. Firstly, under the 'Errors in RERA Decisions' theme, the builder consistently challenged the findings of the RERA forum, alleging misinterpretations of evidence and procedural shortcomings. This suggests a general dissatisfaction with how their cases were handled and a belief that errors were made in the application of the law.

The second theme, 'Amendment Requests,' sheds light on the builder's attempts to seek corrections in prior rulings, indicating a strategic aim to alter outcomes that they initially contested. This legal maneuver, however, was met with resistance, as it was considered outside the purview of RERA's authority to amend its prior orders once they had been adjudicated.

Lastly, 'Improper Hearing Procedures' …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Regulatory Compliance Disputes Procedural Fairness in Legal Proceedings

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, ARG Developers Private Limited, which it won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily fall into two key themes: Regulatory Compliance Disputes and Procedural Fairness in Legal Proceedings.

The first theme covers cases related to the builder's compliance with regulatory frameworks, particularly the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Here, the builder has faced claims from respondents who alleged that the proceedings were not conducted according to the prescribed legal frameworks. The builders' ability to navigate these challenges indicates a robust understanding of regulatory compliance, positioning them advantageously in court.

The second theme involves challenges regarding procedural fairness—the claim by the respondent in the discussed case that the procedures were improperly followed reflects a common concern in real estate disputes. The builder’s success in these matters suggests that they have effectively adhered to or countered claims of procedural lapses, …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Settlement Agreements Withdrawal of Complaints Claims of Payment and Defaults Project Completion Claims Land Use and Classification Disputes Misunderstandings of Regulatory Compliance

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, ARG Developers Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

The disputes primarily revolved around several recurring themes that highlight the nature of the complaints. One major theme was the numerous complaints regarding settlement agreements where the builder successfully demonstrated that it had reached agreements with the complainants, resulting in the withdrawal of complaints. Many of these cases underscored issues of misunderstandings regarding the terms of contracts and the expectations of parties involved.

Another significant category of disputes involved claims related to payments and defaults. In some instances, complainants alleged that they had not received their due amounts or that the projects were incomplete. However, the builder was able to counter these claims, often showing that payments had indeed been made as per agreements, or that projects had reached the necessary completion stages as set forth in initial contracts.

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review