ARHAM DEVELOPERS logo

ARHAM DEVELOPERS

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Understanding ARHAM DEVELOPERS: A Deep Dive into Their Legal History and Buyer Considerations

As a prospective homebuyer or real estate investor in Gujarat, choosing the right builder is crucial to ensuring a smooth purchasing experience. One builder operating in this domain is ARHAM DEVELOPERS. In this blog post, we will delve into the details of their legal history, the implications of past cases on their credibility, and provide tips for buyers considering ARHAM DEVELOPERS or any other builder in the market.

Overview of ARHAM DEVELOPERS

ARHAM DEVELOPERS is primarily active in Gujarat and has made a foray into the competitive real estate landscape of the region. However, before making any investment or purchasing decisions, it’s vital to examine their track record in terms of legal disputes and complaints.

Legal Challenges Faced by ARHAM DEVELOPERS

ARHAM DEVELOPERS has faced a total of one formal complaint which resulted in a legal case. …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Non-compliance with Regulatory Requirements Delayed Submission of Required Documentation Penalties for Project Delays

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder ARHAM DEVELOPERS, which were ultimately lost, revealed significant insights into their operational challenges and the nature of disputes they encountered. The primary themes identified in these cases include: Non-compliance with Regulatory Requirements, Delayed Submission of Required Documentation, and Penalties for Project Delays. Each of these themes underscores a pattern of struggles with adhering to legal norms and regulatory expectations that can affect the builder's reliability.

In the specific case discussed, the builder claimed that they had completed the project and had obtained building use (BU) permission. However, the contention arose over the failure to submit the final report due to alleged technical issues. The respondent countered that the builder's failure to provide the final report within a stipulated timeframe was unjustified. This indicates a recurring theme where builders may attribute delays to external issues, yet fail to comply with critical …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review