CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
As a prospective homebuyer or real estate investor in Gujarat, choosing the right builder is crucial to ensuring a smooth purchasing experience. One builder operating in this domain is ARHAM DEVELOPERS. In this blog post, we will delve into the details of their legal history, the implications of past cases on their credibility, and provide tips for buyers considering ARHAM DEVELOPERS or any other builder in the market.
ARHAM DEVELOPERS is primarily active in Gujarat and has made a foray into the competitive real estate landscape of the region. However, before making any investment or purchasing decisions, it’s vital to examine their track record in terms of legal disputes and complaints.
ARHAM DEVELOPERS has faced a total of one formal complaint which resulted in a legal case. They lost this case, which is essential to note for any potential buyers. Here’s a breakdown of the case details:
From the solitary case noted, a pattern emerges indicating a tendency towards issues with report submissions and adherence to prescribed timelines. The builder's claim of technical issues does raise questions about management efficiency and operational transparency. Losing a case also reflects on the builder's accountability, which is a critical consideration for potential buyers.
Currently, there are no available records indicating that ARHAM DEVELOPERS has won any legal cases, which may raise concerns regarding their operational standards and customer satisfaction.
Based on the provided legal data, ARHAM DEVELOPERS has experienced a challenging start in the real estate sphere with a legal complaint that it lost. The financial penalty incurred demonstrates a deficiency in meeting legal obligations, which could potentially reflect on their overall business practices. For homebuyers, such information is crucial and should inform their decision-making processes.
In conclusion, while ARHAM DEVELOPERS has the potential to contribute positively to the housing market in Gujarat, their current legal troubles can be concerning for prospective buyers. Carefully weighing the available information and following the outlined tips can help ensure that your investment aligns with a safe and reliable building experience. Make informed decisions, and happy house hunting!
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where the builder sued others but didn’t win. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder ARHAM DEVELOPERS, which were ultimately lost, revealed significant insights into their operational challenges and the nature of disputes they encountered. The primary themes identified in these cases include: Non-compliance with Regulatory Requirements, Delayed Submission of Required Documentation, and Penalties for Project Delays. Each of these themes underscores a pattern of struggles with adhering to legal norms and regulatory expectations that can affect the builder's reliability.
In the specific case discussed, the builder claimed that they had completed the project and had obtained building use (BU) permission. However, the contention arose over the failure to submit the final report due to alleged technical issues. The respondent countered that the builder's failure to provide the final report within a stipulated timeframe was unjustified. This indicates a recurring theme where builders may attribute delays to external issues, yet fail to comply with critical timelines set by regulatory authorities. Such disputes highlight a common trigger for litigation among builders, as they often involve penalties for perceived delays, conflating the builder’s claims of completion with an insistence on timely bureaucratic follow-through.
The outcomes of these cases point to several recurrent reasons for the builder’s losses. A notable factor is the insufficient evidence presented by ARHAM DEVELOPERS, which is critical in legal disputes. The authority imposed a penalty of Rs.1,50,000 due to the builder's failure to meet the final reporting requirements, signaling a lack of compliance with established procedures. This suggests a misunderstanding or oversight of legal obligations, categorized under regulatory non-compliance.
Moreover, the builder's reliance on claims surrounding technical difficulties, without solid proof to substantiate their assertions, exposed vulnerabilities in their arguments. Such misunderstandings surrounding project classifications and timelines indicate a broader issue that potential buyers should be aware of: a builder's operational discipline and adherence to regulatory requirements are paramount in ensuring timely project completion and legal compliance. Overall, prospective buyers would do well to meticulously evaluate a builder's history of regulatory adherence and responsiveness to legal obligations.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMC/NCOER/Online/Su… | Gujarat | The promoter, Arham Developers, was penalized for… | ["Non-submission of… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Arham Developers | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1y20UJd6BwIVGTwXYzLL7D1c1hWzLFRTa |