ARHAM INFRA

Introduction

In the realm of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for ensuring a smooth and satisfactory home-buying experience. Today, we delve into the case of Arham Infra, a builder operating mainly in Gujarat. Through a careful analysis of their legal track record, potential buyers can gain insight into the builder's reliability and the associated risks of purchasing property from them.

Overview of Legal Cases

Arham Infra has faced a total of 3 complaints so far, and unfortunately, the track record demonstrates a troubling pattern:

• Cases Won: 0
• Cases Lost: 3

This statistic alone raises red flags regarding the builder's commitment to adhering to legal protocols and regulations.

Analysis of Lost Cases

In the one significant legal case that Arham Infra lost, the following details emerged:

• Claim: The promoter stated they hadn’t intentionally violated the provisions of the Act.
• Verdict: The authority determined that the promoter …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Arham Infra, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common themes and disputes surrounding their projects.

The cases can be broadly categorized into two themes: Delayed Possession Claims and Disputes over Property Ownership and Booking.

Delayed Possession Claims highlight the frustrations of buyers who made payments for properties that were not delivered as promised. In one case, the complainant claimed that despite their payments, Arham Infra had not provided possession of the office or registered a sale deed. This indicates a serious breach of contract and a failure on the part of the builder to meet their obligations, resulting in loss of trust from buyers.

Disputes over Property Ownership and Booking reflect the complexity and often murky nature of property transactions involving builders. In another case, the builder contested the complainant's ownership, claiming they only had tenant rights …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Arham Infra, which it lost revealed insightful information about the recurring challenges faced by the company. The cases can be grouped into two primary themes:

1. Regulatory Non-compliance: This category primarily involves disputes arising from the builder's failure to comply with legal requirements, particularly regarding the registration of units. In the summarized case, the builder was found to have sold units without proper registration, leading to penalties and fines.
2. Penalty Disputes: Many cases seem to revolve around the penalties imposed on the builder for non-compliance or other regulatory issues. In the highlighted case, Arham Infra contested the penalty imposed by the authority but ultimately lost the case, resulting in a fine of Rs. 25,000.

The common reasons why the builder brought cases to court often involved contesting penalties they believed were unwarranted or disputing regulatory actions …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis