ARIHANT ENTERPRISE

Introduction

In the world of real estate, selecting the right builder is a critical decision that can impact your future satisfaction as a homeowner. This blog post delves into ARIHANT ENTERPRISE, a builder based in Rajasthan, examining their history of legal cases, complaint patterns, and overall reputation in the market.

Company Overview

Name: ARIHANT ENTERPRISE
States with Projects: Rajasthan
Number of Complaints: 17
Cases Won: 10
Cases Lost: 7

Legal Case Details

The legal landscape surrounding ARIHANT ENTERPRISE offers insights into their operational practices. Here, we break down the cases against the builder, highlighting trends in both their losses and wins.

Cases Lost

1. Nature of Complaints: The complaints where ARIHANT ENTERPRISE lost often centered around penalties imposed for non-compliance with legal requirements, such as not providing completion certificates or failing to submit Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs). Furthermore, there were cases where settlements were reached, leading to withdrawals of complaints.
2. Common …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Arihant Enterprise, which it lost, revealed significant insights into the builder's operational practices and compliance with regulatory requirements. The cases can be broadly categorized into several themes, highlighting the primary disputes faced by the builder.

One of the most notable themes was the Failure to Provide Promised Facilities. In several instances, plaintiffs claimed that the builder did not deliver promised amenities such as a clubhouse, which is a critical aspect of community living. The builder's defense often revolved around their assertion that facilities were provided as per the agreement, yet the verdicts consistently favored the plaintiffs, emphasizing the need for builders to adhere to their commitments.

Non-Compliance with Completion Certificate Requirements emerged as another significant theme. Numerous cases centered around the builder's failure to obtain necessary completion certificates from competent authorities. The builder's argument that individual units within projects might not require such …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, ARIHANT ENTERPRISE, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases can be grouped into several common themes, each highlighting different aspects of disputes that arose between the builder and various parties involved.

Firstly, we observe cases relating to 'Complaints Settlement', wherein disputes such as the refund of amounts for allocated flats were amicably resolved, indicating that in some instances, direct negotiations between the builder and complainants can lead to satisfactory outcomes for both parties.

Secondly, 'Penalties for Compliance Failures' has emerged as a recurring theme wherein the builder contested the validity of penalties imposed by authorities for purported violations of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. In these cases, the builder argued that penalties were unwarranted, particularly when they had adhered to prior administrative directions. The consistent dismissal of the authority's rectification applications in …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis