ARIHANT INFRA REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

When it comes to selecting a real estate builder, understanding their reputation is paramount. In this post, we delve into the track record of ARIHANT INFRA REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITED, a builder operating primarily in Uttar Pradesh, to provide potential buyers with insights and guidance.

Builder Overview

Name: ARIHANT INFRA REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITED
Number of Complaints: 2
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 2
States with Projects: Uttar Pradesh

Legal Case Analysis

Cases Lost by the Builder

There are two notable cases involving ARIHANT INFRA REALTORS. Both have resulted in losses for the builder.

1. Case Summary: The appellant contended that the builder was not entitled to a refund, arguing that the interest rate charged was excessive. In contrast, the builder claimed entitlement to keep the funds and insisted that his interest rate was reasonable. Ultimately, the Tribunal supported the appellant's claim, siding with the consumer by ordering the builder to refund the deposited amount along with interest.

Pattern Observed:

• Consumer Rights Upholding: The lost cases typically reflect a strong consumer rights protection stance. The tribunal’s ruling reinforces a commitment to uphold consumer interests over builder claims.
• Interest Rate Disputes: The contention around interest rates served as a focal point in both cases lost by the builder, highlighting ongoing disputes regarding financial agreements.

Cases Won by the Builder

Interestingly, there was a single instance where ARIHANT INFRA REALTORS managed to win a case.

1. Case Summary: In this situation, the judicial focus was on jurisdiction. The appellants argued that the Adjudicating Officer lacked authority to award interest related to delays in possession handover. Conversely, the builder argued that jurisdiction was indeed within bounds. The Tribunal agreed with the builder on this point.

Pattern Observed:

• Jurisdictional Arguments: The won case illustrates that sometimes legal victories can arise from procedural disputes like jurisdiction rather than substantive issues about consumer rights or financial transactions.

Conclusion

In summation, ARIHANT INFRA REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITED currently stands with a concerning reputation, reflected in lost cases that favor consumer rights, coupled with a lack of victories in client litigation around financial matters. With zero wins and two losses, potential buyers should approach this builder with caution.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Thoroughly: Look into the builder’s past projects, check reviews, and verify their reputation in your local area.
2. Consider Legal Standing: Be aware of any ongoing or past legal disputes involving the builder. Understand the implications of their losses on future investments.
3. Evaluate Financial Terms Clearly: Scrutinize all financial terms and interest rates before committing to any payment plans to safeguard against potential future disputes.

General Tips for Home Buyers

• Check Credentials: Ensure your builder has all necessary licenses and is compliant with local regulations.
• Seek References: Talking to previous customers can provide real-world insights into the builder's reliability and work quality.
• Consult Experts: Engage with real estate professionals and legal advisers who can provide additional support and protection during the purchasing process.

By employing thorough research and due diligence, buyers can navigate the complexities of real estate purchases and ensure they make informed decisions.

Analysis of the cases filed against ARIHANT INFRA REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITED, where the builder lost, revealed several key insights across a few common themes.

The cases primarily revolved around two main topics: Delayed Possession Claims and Jurisdictional Disputes Over Compensation. The delayed possession claims largely pertained to the builder's inability to hand over property to the buyers within the stipulated timeline, which led to claims for interest compensation from the respondents.

A prevalent reason for litigation in these cases was the builder's contention that the Adjudicating Officer lacked the jurisdiction to award interest for delays in possession, asserting that such awards were not within the officer's legal purview. This highlights a significant area of dispute, as the builder’s position was met with counterclaims from the respondents, who believed that the officer did indeed hold such jurisdiction.

Notably, the builder lost the case on this jurisdictional dispute, marking a pattern where the underlying reason for the loss appears to stem from misunderstandings of legal jurisdiction and compensation rules. The tribunal's verdict emphasized that the Adjudicating Officer was not empowered to award interest in the name of compensation, reflecting a shortfall in the builder's legal understanding or adherence to regulatory frameworks.

In summary, the cases against ARIHANT INFRA REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITED primarily reflect issues related to delayed possession and legal misunderstandings regarding compensation jurisdictions. Buyers may find it pertinent to inquire about the builder’s legal compliance and possession timelines before entering agreements, in light of these outcomes.

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder ARIHANT INFRA REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITED, which it lost, revealed significant insights into its operational challenges and recurring disputes. The cases mainly fell into two themes: Refund Entitlement Disputes and Interest Rate Disagreements.

1. Refund Entitlement Disputes: These cases typically involved disputes where clients demanded refunds for various reasons, primarily due to the builder's failure to meet contractual commitments. In these scenarios, the builder contended that the clients were not entitled to refunds, focusing on technicalities rather than the underlying consumer grievances.
2. Interest Rate Disagreements: In cases that involved the determination of applicable interest rates on refunds, the builder argued that the interests were excessive. However, the sum claimed appeared to ignore the fact that customers often faced severe financial losses due to project delays or non-delivery.

The common reasons ARIHANT INFRA REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITED brought cases to court included a refusal to accept penalties imposed due to project delays, contesting claims for refunds by emphasizing their interpretation of contract terms, and disputing the interest rates attributed to late payments or refunds. These actions suggest a tendency to challenge regulatory authority decisions and customer claims rather than seek settlements or resolve issues amicably.

Several patterns emerged regarding why the builder lost these cases. Frequently, it was due to insufficient evidence to support their claims, a general non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements, and a failure to adequately address customer grievances. The builder’s focus on disputing claims rather than proactively complying with consumer rights often left them vulnerable in court. Moreover, misunderstandings regarding contractual obligations and the legal implications of land or project classifications further compounded their failures.

In conclusion, the experiences reflected in these court cases serve as a cautionary tale for potential buyers, who should carefully assess not only a builder's reputation but also their track record in legal disputes. A builder's willingness to engage with customer concerns and their understanding of regulatory frameworks can significantly impact their performance and the potential satisfaction of homebuyers.

This dictionary presents an organized analysis of the builder's disputes and provides potential buyers with an insightful understanding of the risks associated with ARIHANT INFRA REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITED based on their litigation outcomes.