| CIN | L51900MH1983PLC029643 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | "Arihant Aura" 25th Floor, B-Wing, Plot No.13/1, TTC Industrial Area,Thane Belapur Road,Turbhe, Navi Mumbai Thane MH 400705 IN |
| Company Status | Public |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When considering a real estate investment, it's essential to research the builder's reputation and legal standing. This blog post delves into the legal cases involving ARIHANT SUPERSTRUCTURES LIMITED, analyzing the outcomes to help potential buyers make informed decisions.
Overview of ARIHANT SUPERSTRUCTURES LIMITED
Arihant Superstructures Limited operates primarily in Rajasthan and has garnered a total of 26 complaints throughout its tenure. Out of these, the builder has experienced a significant loss in 21 cases, winning only 5. This stark contrast could raise concerns for potential buyers regarding the reliability and trustworthiness of the builder.
Legal Case Analysis
Cases Lost
The builder lost 5 cases, and a common pattern emerges from these losses:
- Defaults Due to Non-appearance: In three of the cases, the complaints were dismissed in default due to the complainant's failure to appear for hearings, indicating a lack of engagement or support for the claims made against …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against ARIHANT SUPERSTRUCTURES LIMITED, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key issues in their dealings with clients and regulatory authorities.
The majority of the cases center around the Cancellation of Allotment and Delayed Possession Claims. In these cases, the complainants primarily sought relief from the cancellation notices issued by the builder, claiming that their bookings should not have been canceled since they had fulfilled their payment obligations. The builder, on the other hand, consistently argued that cancellations were due to outstanding dues not being settled by the complainants. However, the verdicts overwhelmingly favored the complainants, indicating a legal recognition of their rights to possession and suggesting potential mismanagement or over-zealous cancellation practices by the builder.
Another significant theme is Failure to Deliver Flats as per Agreement. Many complainants alleged that the builder did not adhere to the agreed-upon …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, ARIHANT SUPERSTRUCTURES LIMITED, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases grouped under common themes expose various recurring issues brought forth by complainants. One significant theme is 'Complaint Dismissals,' where cases were routinely dismissed due to the absence of key participants during hearings, indicating a lack of commitment or seriousness from the appellants. Another identified theme is 'Insufficient Documentation,' which highlights instances like the case of Priyank Jain, where the builder did not face any claims due to the complainant's failure to furnish necessary documents. This suggests that for cases to hold up in court, the complainants must adequately prepare their submissions.
Moreover, 'Failure to Appear' resonates strongly in these summaries. Multiple complaints were dismissed simply because the complainants did not show up for hearings, emphasizing the importance of active participation in legal proceedings. The theme of 'Regulatory …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!