CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the complex world of real estate, choosing the right builder can significantly impact the home-buying experience. Today, we take an in-depth look at A.R.Infrastructure Private Limited—a builder based in Madhya Pradesh. With two complaints lodged against them and a complete loss record in legal disputes, it is crucial for potential buyers to be well-informed.
A.R.Infrastructure Private Limited has faced two legal cases, both of which they lost. Here’s a breakdown of the case details:
Both cases demonstrate a clear pattern where A.R.Infrastructure Private Limited failed to provide adequate responses or evidence to substantiate their claims. The absence of a defense significantly influenced the outcomes of the adjudications, resulting in unfavorable judgments for the builder. This indicates potential weaknesses in their operational practices, particularly in customer service and complaint resolution.
Interestingly, despite being involved in two complaints, there are achievements that highlight some level of accountability from the builder. Although there are no cases won against the builder, one case resulted in a partial victory regarding expenditures, suggesting that the framework for compensation is recognized, albeit with heavy sanctions against the builder.
A.R.Infrastructure Private Limited has had a challenging legal history, as reflected in the two lost cases, which can raise red flags for potential buyers. The builder’s inability to effectively contest claims, coupled with a court’s endorsement of the applicants’ rights to compensation, reveals a troubling trend that prospective clients should carefully consider before making a purchase.
For those considering investing in a property from A.R.Infrastructure, or any builder with a similar track record, here are some tips:
Regardless of the specific builder, here are general guidelines to follow when selecting any builder:
In conclusion, A.R.Infrastructure Private Limited shows a legal track record that raises concerns for potential buyers. The outcomes of their legal disputes signal the importance of caution when engaging with them. Empowering yourself with knowledge and strategy while navigating the property market can lead to more satisfying investment decisions.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against A.R. Infrastructure Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key takeaways across the disputes.
The cases can be broadly categorized into three main topics: Compensation Claims, Refund Disputes, and Mental and Physical Distress Claims. Each of these topics highlights the common grievances that the other parties held against the builder, reflecting underlying issues that are crucial to consider in the context of real estate transactions.
The first type of case involves Compensation Claims. In these cases, the applicants sought reimbursement for emotional and physical hardships caused by the builder's actions. The builder's defense was often inadequate, resulting in partial acceptances of the claims by the adjudicating officer. This points to a pattern where the builder may not have fulfilled their obligations, leading to significant distress for the other parties involved.
Refund Disputes represent another significant theme. Here, the applicants claimed that they were entitled to refunds for amounts paid to the builder that were not returned. The builder contested these claims, but ultimately, the adjudicating officer ruled in favor of the applicants, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability in financial dealings related to property.
Lastly, Mental and Physical Distress Claims underscore the human impact of the builder's actions. The adjudicating officer recognized the suffering endured by the applicants and ordered compensation as a means to acknowledge and rectify these injustices.
A common thread throughout these cases is the lack of a substantial defense from the builder, which resulted in their losses. The builder's inability to provide convincing evidence or rebuttals to the claims made against them highlights a concerning trend. It suggests a potential systemic issue within the company's operations and customer service practices, which could impact potential buyers' decisions.
Overall, this analysis serves as a cautionary tale for prospective buyers considering A.R. Infrastructure Private Limited for their real estate needs. It emphasizes the importance of thorough research, reviewing past legal disputes, and assessing the builder's reputation before making a commitment. Understanding these themes can lead to more informed decisions and potentially mitigate future risks.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-2 400-49--4450 | Madhya Pradesh | The applicant sought compensation and interest fo… | ["Compensation", "I… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed compen… | Subhash Barkul | A.R.Infrastructure … | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/823368138838.pdf |
2 4-2 40-22-0336 | Madhya Pradesh | The applicant sought compensation for mental and … | ["Compensation for … | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant sought compens… | Smt. Vaishali Lowal… | A.R.Infrastructure … | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/161711917717.pdf |