ARUN BOOMI CORPORATION

Introduction

In today's real estate market, choosing the right builder is vital for any potential buyer. With numerous builders to choose from, it is crucial to conduct thorough research before making a decision. One name that has come under scrutiny is Arun Boomi Corporation, a builder based in Maharashtra. This blog post delves into their legal performance, analyzing complaints, law cases, and valuable insights for potential buyers.

Overview of Arun Boomi Corporation

Arun Boomi Corporation currently holds one recorded complaint against them, which, in itself, may not sound overly alarming in the vast landscape of real estate. However, the outcome of this complaint is significant as the builder has lost their one recorded case, implying a lack of favorable outcomes in legal matters pertaining to this complaint.

Breakdown of Legal Cases

Summary of Cases:

1. Cases filed against the builder where the builder won: 1 case
   • Appellant Claim: The appellant claimed they had not received a copy of the respondent's reply and sought to set aside the ex-parte order.
   • Respondent Claim: The builder claimed to have filed a reply and served it but the appellant had not received it.
   • Final Verdict: The tribunal allowed the appellant's application to set aside the ex-parte order and directed the builder to file a reply to the appeal.

Patterns in Legal Cases

• Cases Lost:
  • Arun Boomi Corporation has lost the only case against them, which indicates potential issues in responsiveness or adherence to procedural obligations. A loss in a case can bring up concerns about their business practices and how they handle customer grievances.
• Cases Won:
  • The builder was able to successfully set aside an ex-parte order, which underscores a legal victory. The central issue in the case revolved around communication failures (non-receipt of replies), highlighting a frequent challenge in construction disputes: ensuring that all parties have clear and effective communication. The outcome allowed the process to continue, but it does raise questions about their operational practices regarding documentation and response.

Conclusion

In summary, Arun Boomi Corporation's legal journey thus far shows a significant complaint record with a current standing of one loss in court. This lack of favorable outcomes raises a red flag for potential buyers. It's essential to scrutinize not only a builder's finished projects but also their legal standing and responsiveness to complaints.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Thoroughly: Prior to making a purchase, be sure to research the builder's history, including legal disputes and complaints. Legal records can often provide crucial insights into how they manage their projects and customer relations.
2. Communicate Clearly: If you decide to proceed with Arun Boomi Corporation, maintaining open lines of communication is important. Ensure you receive all necessary documentation and confirmations in writing.
3. Look for Reviews: Buyer experiences, whether good or bad, can provide valuable information. Check online forums and review platforms for insights from previous clients.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

1. Check References: Always ask for client references from builders and follow up with them. Understanding previous clients' experiences can illuminate a builder's strengths and weaknesses.
2. Assess Financial Stability: Research the builder’s financial background to ensure they have the resources to complete your project on time.
3. Review Contracts Carefully: Pay attention to the fine print in any contract, ensuring all details are clear regarding timelines, payment schedules, and warranty offers.

Choosing a builder is not a decision to be taken lightly, and understanding their track record can be the key to a successful project.

Analysis of the cases filed against Arun Boomi Corporation, where the builder lost, revealed several key insights across the spectrum of legal disputes associated with real estate development.

The primary theme observed in these cases revolves around "Ex-Parte Orders and Miscommunication." This highlights the challenges faced by the builder in adequately addressing legal claims due to insufficient communication or misunderstandings regarding document submissions and services. In the instance where the builder lost, the case centered on an ex-parte order issued when the appellant claimed they had not received a copy of the respondent's reply. The builder's defense was undermined by their failure to provide convincing evidence that a reply was indeed served to the appellant, leading to a ruling that set aside the ex-parte order and mandated a new reply to the appeal.

Common reasons for bringing cases to court in this context typically involve disputes over procedural fairness and adequate service of legal documents. People may contest the issuance of ex-parte orders when they feel their right to respond has been unfairly truncated. The builder’s litigation often stems from an attempt to defend against such procedural claims, rather than addressing substantive issues related to their development practices.

The builder's losses in these cases primarily arise from insufficient evidence supporting their claims of proper service and response submission. Factors contributing to their defeats include a lack of clear documentation, non-compliance with service protocols, and a general inability to meet the regulatory requirements that govern legal procedures in real estate disputes.