ARUNDHATI INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the realm of real estate development, choosing the right builder is critical for homeowners. Arundhati Infratech Private Limited, based in Odisha, has come under scrutiny due to a notable history of legal complaints and associated verdicts. In this post, we will analyze the builder's performance based on the legal cases filed against them and offer insights for potential buyers.

Builder Profile

• Name: Arundhati Infratech Private Limited
• Number of Complaints: 14
• Cases Won: 0
• Cases Lost: 14

Legal Case Overview

Through careful examination of the cases against Arundhati Infratech, several patterns emerge:

Common Factors in Lost Cases

1. Incomplete Construction: A predominant theme in the complaints is the failure of the builder to complete construction projects as per the agreement. Numerous complainants reported that their simplex houses were not completed, despite having made full payments.
2. Claim of Non-Payment by Complainants: In various cases, the builder frequently argued that construction delays were due to non-payment or late payment from the complainants. However, the final verdicts typically mandated the builder to complete construction regardless of these claims.
3. Possession Issues: Several complaints centered around the builder not handing over possession of homes after the construction was supposedly finished. This has raised significant dissatisfaction among clients, leading them to seek legal redress.
4. Lack of Amenities: The builder was also found accountable for failing to provide promised amenities, suggesting a broader issue with fulfilling contractual obligations.

Common Factors in Won Cases

Interestingly, there are no cases won by Arundhati Infratech, indicating a pattern of failure to defend against allegations brought forth by complainants. Every case ended with a directive from the authority for the builder to fulfill their contractual obligations, pointing towards a consistent trend of non-compliance with contract terms and lacking support for their defenses.

Conclusion

Based on the documented legal history, Arundhati Infratech Private Limited appears to be a builder with significant reputational challenges. The absence of any victories in legal proceedings suggests an inability to satisfactorily respond to claims of contractual breaches.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Do Thorough Research: Before considering a purchase, investigate the builder’s history and reputation. Legal transparency is crucial.
• Request Documentation: Ensure all agreements are documented clearly, with timelines and completion guarantees explicitly stated.
• Understand Your Rights: Familiarize yourself with your rights as a purchaser. Builder responsibilities are often detailed in legal frameworks.
• Seek Reviews from Former Clients: Look for testimonials from previous clients to assess their experiences.

General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder

1. Check Registration: Ensure the builder is registered with a governing body relevant to real estate in your region.
2. Inspect Past Projects: Visiting completed projects can give insights into the builder's quality and reliability.
3. Clarify Payment Structures: Understand all payment schedules and conditions before committing.
4. Know the Fine Print: Be aware of terms concerning project delays, penalties, and dispute resolution.

In conclusion, while purchasing a home is a substantial investment, being informed and vigilant can help mitigate risks associated with builders like Arundhati Infratech Private Limited.

Analysis of the cases filed against Arundhati Infratech Private Limited, which the builder lost, reveals significant insights into the recurring themes surrounding their disputes.

The cases can be broadly categorized into several types, including delayed possession claims, disputes over payment and construction completion, non-compliance with authority orders, and penalties for project delays. The majority of the claims revolved around delayed possession, where the complainants asserted that the builder had failed to complete the construction of their homes or provide necessary amenities, despite having received full payment.

A common trigger for these disputes was the builder's accusation that delays were caused by homeowners' failure to pay installments on time. However, the verdicts consistently favored the complainants, indicating a pattern where the builder's defenses did not meet the required standards to apportion blame to the other party.

The reasons for the builder’s losses in these cases are multifaceted. A prevalent factor was the builder's inability to provide evidence that homeowners were indeed responsible for the delays. Additionally, there were several instances where the builder was found to be non-compliant with authority orders, which further jeopardized their position in the litigation.

The imposition of penalties for violating regulatory requirements highlights the builder's occasional disregard for procedural compliance, which not only necessitated legal action but also resulted in adverse outcomes for the builder.

Overall, this analysis underscores the importance for builders to adhere to timelines, fulfill their contractual obligations, and comply with legal requirements. It also serves as a reminder to homeowners to diligence in understanding their rights and ensuring that builders meet their commitments.