ARYAMAN INFRATECH INTECH PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the competitive world of real estate, buyers must navigate their choices with care, especially when it comes to selecting a builder. One such builder, Aryaman Infratech Intech Private Limited, has garnered attention due to its track record in legal disputes. In this post, we delve into the available data regarding Aryaman Infratech, including the complaints lodged against them, their case outcomes, and what potential buyers should consider before making a purchase.

Legal Background

A brief overview reveals a troubling legal history for Aryaman Infratech:

• Number of Complaints: 6
• Cases Won: 0
• Cases Lost: 6

The absence of successful defenses in court speaks volumes about the company’s dealings and customer satisfaction, prompting buyers to proceed with caution.

Analysis of Legal Cases

Cases Lost:

The six cases lost by Aryaman Infratech suggest a series of patterns that raise concerns:

• Failure to Appear: In multiple instances, the non-applicant failed to appear despite being served notice, indicating a lack of accountability and potential disregard for legal obligations.
• Consistent Losses: All cases ended with the builder losing, with the verdicts leading to the issuance of warrants for recovery and no successful defenses being brought forward. This raises serious doubts about the financial management practices of the builder and their willingness to resolve disputes amicably.

Cases Won:

Interestingly, while the builder lost all cases, some cases did not lead to a favorable outcome despite initial claims:

• Recovery Orders: The Tribunal directed actions toward the recovery of amounts owed without any favorable verdicts for the builder, indicating a challenging financial situation and a lack of successful rebuttals to the claims made against them.
• Instructions Issued: The registrar was involved numerous times to ensure compliance, pointing toward a systematic problem in adhering to legal resolutions and maintaining responsible operational practices.

Conclusion

From the available information, Aryaman Infratech Intech Private Limited presents a concerning profile regarding reliability and accountability in their business practices. With the absence of any case wins and a pattern of lost cases attributed to their failure to adequately address claims, potential buyers should exercise extreme caution before engaging with this builder.

Tips for Potential Buyers:

1. Conduct Thorough Research: Investigate the builder's history, customer reviews, and any past legal issues to gauge their reliability.
2. Request Documentation: Ensure you ask for all necessary documentation related to the project's compliance and legal standings before committing.
3. Seek Professional Advice: Consult with real estate professionals or legal advisors to understand your rights and options before making a purchase.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder:

• Check Credentials: Verify the builder’s registrations, certifications, and any affiliations with professional organizations.
• Examine Previous Projects: Look at their previous developments to assess quality and reliability.
• Understand Warranty and Service Policies: Ensure you know what warranties and service agreements are provided.
• Communicate Openly: Establish clear communication with the builder from the outset to address any concerns promptly.

In conclusion, navigating the real estate market requires diligence and awareness. Aryaman Infratech Intech Private Limited's track record, as observed from the data, underscores the importance of making informed decisions when selecting a builder.

Analysis of the cases filed against Aryaman Infratech Intech Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolved around three common topics: failure to appear claims, recovery of amount disputes, and non-compliance with legal notices.

Many of the cases involved claims from applicants stating that the builder failed to appear despite being served with legal notices. This points to a troubling trend where the builder may not have taken legal obligations seriously or may have avoided accountability, leading to further legal consequences.

The recovery of amount disputes often followed from these failure to appear cases, as the applicants sought to reclaim funds presumably tied to project delays or other grievances. The consistent verdicts calling for the issuance of warrants for recovery suggest systemic issues in the builder's financial dealings or project management, which could raise red flags for potential buyers.

Non-compliance with legal notices and procedures also emerged as a significant theme. The builder's lack of response to claims and notices not only led to losses in court but also incurred additional penalties and procedural delays. This may indicate a fundamental misunderstanding of legal requirements or an inability to keep pace with regulatory obligations, both of which could affect project timelines and handover dates.

The reasons people commonly brought cases against this builder include contesting what appears to be negligence or non-responsiveness, resulting in financial losses or delays. The patterns from these summaries show that the builder’s litigation often stemmed from its own inaction rather than external factors.

The conclusion to be drawn from the outcomes of these cases is that the builder likely lost due to a combination of insufficient evidence (or lack thereof, as they failed to file claims) and non-compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. Their failure to adhere to interim directions and properly address notices expedited the issuance of warrants against them, highlighting an unsettling lack of engagement with the legal process and the expectations of their clients.