| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Understanding AS Shams Developers: A Comprehensive Overview
Introduction
When it comes to property development, choosing the right builder is essential for ensuring a smooth and satisfying purchasing experience. AS Shams Developers, operating primarily in Gujarat, has emerged as a notable player in the real estate market. In this article, we will delve into the performance of AS Shams Developers, examining their legal track record and providing insights and advice for potential buyers.
Legal Track Record
AS Shams Developers has faced legal challenges, having recorded a total of one complaint filed against them. The details of this legal case are as follows:
Case Overview
- Type of Case: Regulatory compliance
- Appellant Claim: The appellant contended that AS Shams Developers failed to comply with relevant regulations and neglected to submit the final account of the project within the stipulated timeframe.
- Respondent Claim: In response, AS Shams Developers claimed they had completed the project …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against AS Shams Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases highlight ongoing issues in three primary areas: regulatory compliance disputes, delayed submission of project accounts, and penalties for non-compliance.
The first theme, regulatory compliance disputes, encompasses claims made by the appellants stating that the builder failed to adhere to the established regulations governing project completion and accounting. This suggests a systemic issue where the builder may not have prioritized compliance, leading to legal consequences.
The second theme revolves around the delayed submission of project accounts. In one notable case, the builder contested the claim, stating that they had indeed submitted the final project account, yet it was not accepted by the appellant. This indicates a communication breakdown or a potential misunderstanding regarding project accounting requirements, which further aggravated the dispute.
Penalties for non-compliance constitute the third theme, where …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!