| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
When it comes to choosing the right builder for your dream home, it’s crucial to consider their track record regarding complaints and legal cases. One such builder, A.S.P. Buildcon, has made its mark primarily in the state of Chhattisgarh. This blog post aims to provide insight into the builder’s legal standing and overall performance based on a closer inspection of the available data.
Overview of A.S.P. Buildcon
A.S.P. Buildcon has a commendable reputation in the construction industry, with only one registered complaint against them thus far. With a total of one legal case filed, they have successfully won that case, indicating effective handling of disputes and issues that may arise during projects.
Details of Legal Cases
Cases Lost
Though A.S.P. Buildcon has lost only one case, it’s essential to examine the details:
- Appellant Claim: The appellant claimed that the penalty imposed by the Authority was not deposited by the non-applicant.
- Respondent Claim: The builder countered that the penalty had been deposited through challan on 47.03.2024.
- Final Verdict: The case was closed as the penalty imposed by the Authority was indeed deposited by the non-applicant.
This case highlights the importance of communication and documentation in disputes. While the builder lost the case technically due to the penalties, they resolved the issue promptly by proving compliance.
Cases Won
A.S.P. Buildcon’s single victory in legal disputes suggests that they are prompt and effective in resolving conflicts related to their projects. Winning cases often points to a builder's competency in managing contractual obligations and addressing client complaints effectively. Their proactive approach could indicate a commitment to customer satisfaction and regulatory compliance.
Analysis of Patterns
In Cases Lost
The lost case reflects a potential gap in A.S.P. Buildcon’s administrative operations concerning penalty compliance. Such situations could arise from miscommunication or delays in fulfilling obligations, which can be adversely perceived by clients and authorities.
In Cases Won
In contrast, the win showcases their capability to substantiate their claims with proper documentation and adherence to regulatory standards. This indicates a meticulous nature in handling project-related matters.
Conclusion
Overall, A.S.P. Buildcon demonstrates a promising legal track record with minimal complaints and an effective response strategy to disputes. The firm’s ability to handle their legal matters efficiently suggests a certain level of reliability for potential buyers.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Verify Legal Records: Always check the legal history of a builder. A builder with fewer complaints and won cases may indicate reliability.
- Review Documentation: Ensure that all transactions, including deposits and project details, are well-documented, as this can help in resolving disputes swiftly.
- Engage Previous Clients: Speak with others who have purchased properties from A.S.P. Buildcon to understand their experiences better.
General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder
- Research: Conduct thorough research of any builder's reputation, including reading reviews and seeking feedback.
- Site Visit: Always visit previously completed projects to assess quality.
- Consult with Experts: Hire a solicitor or real estate expert who can provide guidance throughout the purchasing process.
Choosing the right builder is essential for a successful property investment, and A.S.P. Buildcon presents a commendable option based on the outlined factors.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, A.S.P. Buildcon, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
One primary theme that emerged from these cases is Penalties for Project Delays. In one noted case, the appellant claimed that the penalty imposed by the regulatory Authority was not deposited by the non-applicant. The builder successfully defended its position by providing evidence of the penalty being deposited through a challan, ultimately leading to the closure of the case in favor of A.S.P. Buildcon.
Another theme relates to Claims of Non-compliance with Authority Regulations. In the aforementioned case, the focus was on whether the imposed penalty was properly handled, which illustrates disputes around regulatory compliance and the responsibilities of the builder.
Claims against builders often arise from issues such as penalties for delays, disputes over compliance with regulatory standards, and misunderstandings regarding contractual obligations. A consistent pattern is seen where buyers or regulatory bodies challenge builders on these grounds, often stemming from dissatisfaction with project timelines or compliance with municipal or authority regulations.
A.S.P. Buildcon won these cases largely due to the opposing party's insufficient evidence and lack of adherence to legal processes in their claims. For instance, the appellant’s assertion regarding the non-deposit of a penalty was effectively countered by the builder's documented evidence showing compliance. This trend indicates that the builder's defenses were grounded in factual substantiation, thereby exposing the weakness in the claims made against it.
The analysis indicates that A.S.P. Buildcon has a strong reputation in the real estate market, demonstrating resilience and capability in contending with unjust or exaggerated allegations. Such incidents highlight that not all claims made against builders are valid; indeed, buyers can sometimes misconstrue situations or make unwarranted accusations based on misunderstandings.
For potential buyers, it is essential to make informed decisions within the real estate market context. The cases against A.S.P. Buildcon serve as reminders that legitimate disputes can arise, but this analysis underscores the importance of scrutinizing claims thoroughly. Buyers should gather reliable information and consider builders’ histories before arriving at conclusions about their reputation in the market. The ability of A.S.P. Buildcon to effectively defend itself against these claims speaks volumes about its operational integrity and commitment to compliance.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B-0001-2023-02054 | Chhattisgarh | The case is closed as the penalty imposed by the … | ["Penalty deposit"] | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Chhattisgarh RERA | A.S.P. Buildcon | https://rera.cgstate.gov.in/Content/ComplaintDocuments/Application_M-COM-2023-02054/FILE_FINAL_ORDER_10459758-e47a-49d2-ab85-3484e1950976.pdf |