2 2-065/,-7-02522 2-065/,-7-0252 |
MPMP |
The applicant, Shri Prakhar Chandra, pleaded his …The applicant, Shri Prakhar Chandra, pleaded his case against Assotech Limited for not delivering a studio apartment as per the agreement. The Authority directed the applicant to inspect the building, pay the balance, and get possession. |
["Delayed Delivery"…["Delayed Delivery", "Non-Payment"] |
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that h…{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that he had booked a studio apartment from Assotech Limited, but the property was not delivered within the agreed-upon 3 years. He sought compensation and return of his money with interest.", "respondent_claim": "Assotech Limited claimed that the applicant had not paid the amounts on time and that the cheque for one installment had bounced. They stated that the property was ready for possession and that the applicant needed to pay the balance.", "final_verdict": "The Authority directed the applicant to inspect the building, pay the balance, and get possession. The applicant was not entitled to compensation as he had not paid any amount towards the property.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} |
Shri Prakhar ChandraShri Prakhar Chandra |
Assotech LimitedAssotech Limited |
Link |
4-65/-7-0663 and 5-…4-65/-7-0663 and 5-65/-7-0663 |
Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh |
The applicant, Shri Saurabh Singh Chauhan, filed …The applicant, Shri Saurabh Singh Chauhan, filed a complaint against the promoter, Assotech Limited, for not completing the work and not giving possession of the shop. The authority directed the allottee to take possession within 30 days and the promoter to complete the incomplete work. |
["Possession of sho…["Possession of shop", "Incomplete work"] |
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t…{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that the promoter did not complete the work and did not give possession of the shop despite receiving the payment.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the work was completed and the applicant did not pay the balance amount.", "final_verdict": "The authority directed the allottee to take possession within 30 days and the promoter to complete the incomplete work.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} |
Shri Saurabh Singh …Shri Saurabh Singh Chauhan |
Assotech LimitedAssotech Limited |
Link |
4-65/-7-06634-65/-7-0663 |
Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh |
The applicant, Shri Saurabh Singh Chauhan, filed …The applicant, Shri Saurabh Singh Chauhan, filed a complaint against the non-applicant, Assotech Limited, for not providing possession of a shop in the Windsor Hills project. The authority ordered the allottee to take possession within 30 days and the promoter to complete the incomplete road and provide improvement work. |
["Possession of sho…["Possession of shop", "Incomplete road"] |
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t…{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that the non-applicant had not provided possession of the shop despite receiving payment and that the non-applicant had not completed the work as per the agreement.", "respondent_claim": "The non-applicant claimed that the work was complete except for the 200-meter road and that the allottee had not made payments on time.", "final_verdict": "The authority ordered the allottee to take possession within 30 days and the promoter to complete the incomplete road and provide improvement work.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} |
Shri Saurabh Singh …Shri Saurabh Singh Chauhan |
Assotech LimitedAssotech Limited |
Link |
682 of 2019682 of 2019 |
HaryanaHaryana |
Complaint against real estate promoter for delay …Complaint against real estate promoter for delay in possession of flat. Authority directed promoter not to cancel allotment and awarded interest on delayed possession. |
["Delay in possessi…["Delay in possession", "Interest on delayed possession"] |
{"appellant_claim": "Delay in possession of flat …{"appellant_claim": "Delay in possession of flat by promoter. Request for direction not to cancel allotment and award of interest on delayed possession.", "respondent_claim": "Not provided", "final_verdict": "Authority directed promoter not to cancel allotment and awarded interest on delayed possession.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} |
Mr. Rahul Rai GuptaMr. Rahul Rai Gupta |
Assotech LimitedAssotech Limited |
Link |
3410 of 20213410 of 2021 |
HaryanaHaryana |
The complainants, Kulvinder Singh Kohli and Kiran…The complainants, Kulvinder Singh Kohli and Kiran K Kohli, filed a complaint against Assotech Limited for violation of section 11(4)(a) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. The authority found the respondent in contravention of the section and passed directions. |
["Non-compliance of…["Non-compliance of possession date", "Delay in possession"] |
{"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed tha…{"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed that the respondent failed to hand over the possession of the flat within the stipulated period of 42 months from the date of allotment.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the delay was due to various reasons, including institution of liquidation proceedings against the contractor company, resulting in shortage of labour at the project site.", "final_verdict": "The authority found the respondent in contravention of section 11(4)(a) of the Act and passed directions for payment of delay possession charges at the prescribed rate of interest.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"} |
Kiran K KohliKiran K Kohli |
Assotech LimitedAssotech Limited |
Link |