ATITHI INFRA

Introduction

In the world of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for ensuring a smooth and successful purchase process. One such builder, ATITHI INFRA, operates in the state of Gujarat and has encountered legal hurdles that potential buyers should be aware of. This article delves into the builder's legal case history, drawing important insights that can guide your purchasing decision.

Overview of Complaints and Legal Cases

ATITHI INFRA has faced a total of 1 complaint, which has resulted in a lost case. The details of this legal case shed light on the firm's operational practices and adherence to regulatory standards.

The Legal Case Breakdown

The case details are as follows:

• Appellant Claim: The promoter, ATITHI INFRA, asserted that they completed their project within the agreed timeline; however, they failed to acquire the Building Use (BU) permission required by law.
• Respondent Claim: On the other hand, the authority maintained that ATITHI INFRA did not submit the final report on the RERA (Real Estate Regulatory Authority) web portal within the stipulated deadline.
• Final Verdict: The regulatory authority decided against ATITHI INFRA, imposing a penalty of Rs. 50,000 for non-compliance with the RERA Act.

Common Patterns in the Case

From the details of the singular case ATITHI INFRA has faced, some patterns can be discerned:

• Regulatory Compliance Issues: The primary issue leading to the loss of the case revolves around a failure to comply with regulatory requirements, specifically the timely submission of documentation to RERA. This indicates a potential area of concern regarding ATITHI INFRA's operational management and compliance practices.

Lack of Wins

Notably, ATITHI INFRA has not recorded any cases won, reinforcing the challenges faced by the builder. This absence of victories in legal disputes may reflect on their overall credibility and operational transparency, which potential buyers should carefully consider.

Overall Assessment of ATITHI INFRA

Based on the available data, ATITHI INFRA demonstrates troubling patterns that could raise red flags for prospective homebuyers:

• The single complaint and subsequent loss in a legal case suggest a lack of effective compliance with real estate regulations.
• The builder's operational integrity may be questionable given their current standing before regulatory authorities.

Tips for Potential Buyers

If you are considering purchasing a property from ATITHI INFRA, here are some tailored tips:

1. Conduct Due Diligence: Investigate further into the builder’s reputation in the market. Look for reviews, feedback from former clients, and any additional ongoing or past legal disputes.
2. Verify Documentation: Ensure that all required permissions and approvals (like BU permission) have been obtained for the projects you are interested in.
3. Seek Expert Opinions: Consult with real estate professionals who have knowledge of the local market and can provide insights into ATITHI INFRA’s credibility.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

Regardless of the builder you consider, keep the following tips in mind when making your decision:

1. Research Builder's History: Look into past projects, customer satisfaction, and whether the builder has had any legal issues.
2. Check for Licenses and Registrations: Ensure that the builder is properly registered with relevant regulatory authorities.
3. Visit Existing Projects: If possible, visit some of the builder's completed projects to assess their quality and craftsmanship.
4. Review Contracts Carefully: Analyze all contracts and ensure that you understand the terms, conditions, and any penalties that may apply.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while ATITHI INFRA has the potential to offer projects in Gujarat, the existing legal history suggests a need for caution and thorough investigation. As a potential buyer, prioritize regulatory compliance, seek opinion from trusted sources, and ensure comprehensive due diligence to protect your investment.

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Atithi Infra, which it lost, reveals significant insights into the builder's operational issues and legal challenges. These cases can be categorized into a few key themes that reflect the common disputes and patterns of litigation faced by the builder.

1. Regulatory Non-compliance: One prominent theme identified is the builder's challenges in aligning with regulatory requirements. Specifically, the promoter claimed that the project was completed by the due date but failed to obtain the Building Use (BU) permission. The authority's response highlighted that the builder did not submit the final report on the RERA web portal within the stipulated time. This suggests a struggle with complying with the necessary bureaucratic regulations, which ultimately led to penalties.
2. Penalties for Project Delays: Another recurring issue is the imposition of fines as a consequence of project delays. In this instance, the authority penalized the builder Rs. 50,000 for various breaches of the RERA Act, reflecting a pattern where Atithi Infra frequently disputed penalties linked to project timelines and reporting.
3. Failure to Obtain Necessary Permits: The cases demonstrate difficulties in acquiring essential permits, which further complicated compliance with completion deadlines. The builder's assertion that work was completed overlooks the crucial step of obtaining necessary approvals, shedding light on possible neglect of procedural obligations.

The common reasons for bringing cases to court include contesting penalties imposed by authorities, disputing attributions of delays caused by external factors, and disagreements over compliance with municipal regulations. Such disputes often emerge from unfavorable interpretations of the timelines and obligations laid out in agreements or regulatory frameworks.

However, the builder faced challenges in securing favorable outcomes, primarily due to inadequate evidence to support claims, consistent non-compliance with legal standards, and failure to adhere to interim directives provided by regulatory bodies. Moreover, misunderstandings around land or project classification rules contributed to the builder's lack of defense in these cases. Thus, the analysis underscores the importance of ensuring rigorous compliance with all regulatory norms to mitigate litigation risks and maintain good standing in the real estate market.