No Logo Available

ATJ INFRASTRUCTURE

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the ever-evolving real estate industry, understanding a builder's track record can be crucial for potential buyers. Today, we shine a spotlight on ATJ Infrastructure, a builder operating primarily in Gujarat, and delve into their legal challenges and overall reputation.

Overview of ATJ Infrastructure

ATJ Infrastructure is a builder based in Gujarat, known for engaging in various property projects. However, it is vital for potential clients to be aware of the builder's legal standing and complaint history, which can significantly influence the buying decision.

Complaint and Legal Case Summary

ATJ Infrastructure has registered a total of 1 complaint against them. Notably, out of the legal cases associated with this builder, they have lost 1 case and won 0 cases. This indicates a concerning trend regarding the builder’s ability to contest complaints effectively.

Legal Case Details

The single case that concluded unfavorably for ATJ Infrastructure illustrates significant implications:

  • Respondent Claim: The builder asserted they were unaware of the RERA Act and did not intend to violate its provisions.
  • Final Verdict: The Gujrera Authority determined that ATJ Infrastructure violated Section 3(1) of the RERA Act, imposing a fine of Rs. 55,000/- on them.

This legal outcome suggests that ATJ Infrastructure may lack sufficient awareness or compliance with key regulations governing the real estate sector.

Patterns in Legal Outcomes

Cases Lost

The primary pattern observed in ATJ Infrastructure's legal loss revolves around their lack of awareness regarding regulatory requirements, specifically the RERA Act. This could indicate negligence or inadequate training concerning compliance measures.

Cases Won

Given that ATJ Infrastructure has not won any cases to date, it raises questions about their capability to defend against allegations or complaints effectively, emphasizing a lack of positive legal outcomes.

Conclusion: Assessing ATJ Infrastructure

Based on the data presented, ATJ Infrastructure shows a troubling legal track record, with a single complaint filed and no cases won. The imposition of fines underlines the importance of being aware of regulatory frameworks in the construction industry, which raise concerns about the builder's operational practices.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  1. Research Builder Reputation: Before making a purchasing decision, investigate other buyers' experiences and any complaints filed against the builder.
  2. Ask About Compliance: Inquire how well the builder adheres to local regulations and laws, especially in terms of awareness of the RERA Act.
  3. Review Legal History: Assess any legal disputes involving the builder, focusing on the nature and outcomes of those cases.
  4. Inspect Qualified Projects: Examine the builder’s completed projects for quality and compliance with agreements.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

  • Check References: Speak with past clients to gain insights into the builder's reliability and quality of work.
  • Verify Credentials: Ensure that the builder has the necessary licenses and certifications.
  • Review Contracts Carefully: Understand the terms of engagement before signing any agreements to protect your interests.

Final Thoughts

In conclusion, while ATJ Infrastructure may have potential, their track record raises red flags that buyers should carefully consider. Being informed and vigilant during the home-buying process can pave the way for more secure investments in real estate.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Non-compliance with RERA Act Penalties for Regulatory Violations

Analysis of the cases filed against ATJ Infrastructure, where the builder lost, revealed several key points across the spectrum of disputes encountered by the builder. The cases highlight two primary themes: non-compliance with the RERA Act and penalties incurred due to regulatory violations.

The first theme, non-compliance with the RERA Act, stands out in the cases where the builder was found to be in violation of the Act, leading to legal repercussions. The RERA Act is designed to protect the interests of homebuyers and ensure that builders adhere to accepted standards and practices. In the case summarized, the builder was fined for not adhering to the provisions outlined in the RERA Act, specifically Section 3(1), which likely deals with the mandatory registration of projects under the Act. This highlights a pattern where builders may face legal challenges when they fail to comply with regulatory requirements, emphasizing the importance of understanding and adhering to the RERA Act in real estate ventures.

The second theme revolves around penalties for regulatory violations, which is closely linked to the first theme. Builders who do not comply with the appropriate regulations often find themselves facing various penalties, as seen in the case where ATJ Infrastructure was imposed a fine of Rs. 55,000/- by the Gujrera Authority. These penalties serve as a deterrent against non-compliance and underline the legal obligations that builders have towards their clients and the broader regulatory framework.

Common reasons for the builder’s litigation in these cases include:

  • Contesting penalties: Builders often find themselves in court trying to contest the penalties imposed on them for non-compliance or other regulatory violations.
  • Disputing project delays: While not explicitly detailed in the cases summarized, project delays are a frequent source of litigation in real estate, where builders may dispute claims of delays attributed to them.
  • Regulatory misunderstandings: As highlighted by the respondent's claim of being unaware of the RERA Act, many cases may stem from a lack of understanding or misinformation regarding regulatory requirements, leading to unintended violations.

The builder lost these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence of compliance with the RERA Act and other regulatory requirements. The fact that the respondent claimed a lack of awareness of the RERA Act suggests a significant misunderstanding of their obligations, which likely contributed to the verdict against them. Overall, these cases stress the importance of education and compliance in the real estate sector to avoid legal consequences.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review