| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction to Atlantic Builders
In the real estate market, making an informed decision is imperative, particularly when selecting a builder for your dream home or investment. Today, we delve into the specifics of Atlantic Builders, a firm specialized in constructing properties in Punjab. Our analysis is grounded in the limited yet revealing data available regarding their performance in legal matters.
Overview of Complaints Against Atlantic Builders
With only one documented complaint against Atlantic Builders, it’s crucial to understand the context and outcome of this case to gauge the builder's reliability. Atlantic Builders has lost this case, with no successful defenses noted on their part. However, it’s essential to note that there was also a case where a complaint was withdrawn, allowing for a peculiar context on their legal standing.
Legal Case Summary
- Cases Filed Against the Builder Where the Builder Won: 1 case
- Summary of Cases: The complaint in this instance was ultimately withdrawn with an allowance to approach another forum, indicating a potential strategy from the appellant rather than a definitive victory for Atlantic Builders. The finite nature of this outcome leaves much to examine about the builder's standing.
Analysis of Legal Cases
Patterns in Cases the Builder Has Lost
- Limited Data for Analysis: Given there is only one reported legal loss, comprehensive patterns are difficult to discern. However, the fact that a complaint led to a withdrawal suggests that while the case was initiated, it may not have had sufficient grounds to proceed in that particular forum. This could imply either a possible miscommunication or dissatisfaction that didn't warrant escalation.
Patterns in Cases the Builder Has Won
- Non-Defense Winning: The builder's single noted win, which resulted from the withdrawal of a complaint, may suggest an encouragement for clients to explore other avenues of legal recourse instead of pursuing a battle in that specific forum. The builder's ability to maintain their position without a substantive victory may raise questions about their effectiveness in navigating legal disputes.
Conclusion: Assessing Atlantic Builders
In conclusion, based on the data reviewed, Atlantic Builders presents a somewhat ambiguous narrative. While they have not faced a high volume of complaints, the one recorded case reflects an outcome that does not showcase substantial legal prowess or client satisfaction.
For potential buyers considering Atlantic Builders, vigilance is essential. Here are some tips:
- Do Your Research: Look beyond the available data and seek personal referrals or testimonials from previous clients.
- Consult Legal Help: If there are any lingering doubts about the contractual agreements or past performance, engaging a lawyer could provide clarity before making a decision.
- Trust Your Instinct: While the legal footprint suggests some challenges, it's also important to consider the builder's project results and overall reputation in your local community.
General Tips for Buyers When Selecting a Builder
- Review Past Projects: Visit completed projects and evaluate the quality of work firsthand.
- Investigate Credentials: Verify the builder’s licensing, insurance, and any industry awards or recognitions.
- Know Your Rights: Familiarize yourself with local real estate laws and buyer's protections to ensure you are adequately represented.
Choosing the right builder can significantly impact your real estate investment. By staying informed and diligent, prospective buyers can navigate these decisions more effectively.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Atlantic Builders, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into delayed possession claims, non-compliance with municipal orders, disputes over land conversion or classification, and penalties for project delays.
Many of the cases involve penalties for delays, where the builder faced legal action due to an inability to deliver projects on time. This points to a troubling trend in which buyers were left waiting for their promised properties, leading to frustration and legal recourse. The builder's defense in these cases was often rooted in claims of unforeseen circumstances or attributing delays to other parties involved in the project. However, the legal outcomes suggest that the builder's reasoning did not meet the required standards to defend against the penalties imposed.
Additionally, there were several instances of non-compliance with municipal orders, which raised concerns about the builder's adherence to regulations and laws governing construction and land use. Buyers and municipalities alike expressed grievances over the builder's failure to secure proper approvals or comply with zoning restrictions, leading to legal actions that the builder ultimately lost.
Disputes over land conversion or classification also emerged as a significant theme. In these cases, the builder faced challenges from buyers or other stakeholders regarding the intended use of land or the classification of projects. The builder's losses in these disputes indicate a lack of clarity or adherence to established land-use guidelines, further highlighting potential issues in their operational practices.
The common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases seem to revolve around insufficient evidence to support their claims, non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements, and a failure to understand or adhere to land classification rules. The consistent pattern of losses in diverse yet significant cases underscores the importance for potential buyers to exercise caution when considering projects by Atlantic Builders. It is crucial for buyers to conduct thorough research, assess the builder's reputation, and evaluate prior legal disputes before making any investment.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCNo17482020 | Punjab | Complaint withdrawn by the complainant with liber… | ["Complaint withdra… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Sumita Dhanjal | Atlantic Builders | https://rera.punjab.gov.in/rera/rwdataOrdersJudgements\2020\/20201013OJbyAuth63f2faf9-9059-4b84-8a14-183a2e0c877b.pdf |