ATS TELKOM TOWER INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE

Introduction

In the competitive landscape of real estate, potential buyers often face the challenge of selecting trustworthy builders. One such builder, ATS Telkom Tower Infrastructure Private, is currently under scrutiny due to legal issues and project complaints. This article aims to evaluate the builder's performance based on the provided complaints and legal case outcomes.

Overview of ATS Telkom Tower Infrastructure

ATS Telkom Tower Infrastructure Private has operations in Gujarat and has been involved in several projects, including the 'Noor-e-Mehroon Apartment' scheme. Despite having a significant footprint in the real estate sector, the company has attracted a not-so-flattering number of complaints.

Legal Case Analysis

As per the available data, ATS Telkom Tower Infrastructure Private has faced one complaint which culminated in a legal case. The complainant accused the builder of improperly managing their commitment regarding the 'Noor-e-Mehroon Apartment' scheme after they had made a payment of Rs. 1,50,000/- for a unit. However, the case was dismissed because the complainant withdrew the complaint after settling with the builder. This outcome indicates a lack of formal judgment against ATS Telkom Tower, which could suggest the possibility of negotiation and resolution outside of court.

Cases Won

Interestingly, ATS Telkom has one case in which it was favorable, but it is crucial to note that this case was dismissed following the complaint being withdrawn after an out-of-court settlement. The resolution technique in this case hints at possible amicable dispute resolution strategies employed by the builder, even though no formal win was recorded by the legal system.

Cases Lost

On the contrary, the builder has lost one legal case definitively, which reflects a risk factor for potential buyers. This solitary loss may not necessarily paint a comprehensive picture of the builder's reliability but does require careful consideration for future buyers.

Patterns and Common Factors

Cases Lost

• Withdrawal of Complainant: The one complaint led to a withdrawal after a settlement which signifies that even in dissatisfaction, ATS Telkom may have found a path to negotiate, albeit not formally winning the case.

Cases Won

• Resolution Reached: The case was won in the sense that the builder managed to settle before further legal actions, but it highlights the importance of negotiations over contentious disputes.

Conclusion

In assessing ATS Telkom Tower Infrastructure Private, potential buyers must weigh the solitary complaint and the case results cautiously. While the builder has the capability of working through disputes amicably, the fact that there has been a public complaint and a case represents a red flag that shouldn't be ignored. Although the builder operates in Gujarat and may offer appealing projects, buyers should approach with careful consideration.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Due Diligence: Research the builder's past projects and their completion records. Look for reviews or complaints from prior clients.
2. Understanding Legal Standing: Be familiar with any active or past cases involving the builder and how those cases were handled.
3. Contract Clarity: Ensure that all agreements are clearly stated in the sale contract, with precise terms regarding sales deeds and payment stages.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

• Check Financial Stability: Research the builder's financial health to ensure stability throughout the project lifecycle.
• Quality Assurance: Visit existing projects and assess the quality of construction and materials used.
• Customer Service: Evaluate how the builder addresses client concerns and complaints. Good builders should have a responsive customer care department.

In sum, while ATS Telkom Tower Infrastructure Private has the potential to be a reliable builder through negotiation, careful scrutiny of their performance and legal history is essential for potential buyers.

Analysis of the cases filed against ATS Telkom Tower Infrastructure Private, where the builder lost, reveals several key points regarding their legal disputes.

The primary theme observed in these cases is related to "Advance Payment and Deed Disputes." This theme encompasses issues surrounding the financial transactions made by buyers, particularly advances given to secure property units, and the obligations of the builder to provide timely and valid documentation, such as registered sale deeds.

Common reasons for litigation in this area include disputes over the provision of sale deeds after advance payments have been made. Buyers often contest the builder’s failure to deliver promised documents within a reasonable timeframe, which leads to a loss of trust and prompts legal action. In the case of ATS Telkom, the complainant booked a unit in the 'Noor-e-Mehroon Apartment' scheme and paid an advance of Rs. 1,50,000/-, only to find themselves without a registered sale deed, compelling them to seek legal recourse.

The builder’s losses in these cases typically stem from their inability to fulfill contractual obligations, particularly concerning documentation. The swift resolution via settlement in the highlighted case suggests that ATS Telkom might have preferred to negotiate rather than face the implications of inadequate record-keeping or potential non-compliance with real estate regulations.

Overall, this pattern indicates a significant concern for potential buyers regarding the builder's reliability in handling advances and ensuring proper legal processes. It is crucial for buyers to conduct thorough due diligence and to be wary of builders with a history of such disputes before making any financial commitments.