| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When it comes to selecting a builder for your next construction project, understanding their track record can greatly influence your decision. In this post, we will delve into the performance of A.U. Buildcon, a builder operating in Gujarat, and provide insights based on their legal history, focusing on complaints and court cases.
Overview of A.U. Buildcon
A.U. Buildcon has maintained an interesting profile in the construction sector with only 1 complaint filed against them and a perfect record in court, having won 1 case and lost none—except for one instance where a fine was imposed. Their operations are currently limited to the state of Gujarat.
Legal Case Details
- Cases Filed Against the Builder: 1 case
- Outcome: 1 case won (the fine applies to this instance)
- Details of the Case: The promoter was penalized for failing to submit quarterly reports as required by the RERA Act, resulting in a fine …
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, A.U. Buildcon, which the builder won, revealed the following information:
The cases primarily clustered around two common themes: Regulatory Non-compliance and Penalties for Project Delays. In the first category, the claims generally pertained to failures in adhering to the requirements laid out in the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) Act, such as timely submission of quarterly reports. On the other hand, cases involving penalties for project delays indicate tensions arising over the expected timelines for project completion and the associated expectations of stakeholders.
The disputes often stemmed from claims regarding non-compliance with regulatory mandates, particularly accusations directed at the builder for failing to fulfill statutory obligations. In the case reviewed, the opposing party claimed that the promoter did not submit quarterly reports, leading to the imposition of a fine. Such cases illustrate a broader pattern where buyers or regulatory bodies sought …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!
Submit Your Review
Interested in buying from A.U. BUILDCON?
Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.