CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
When it comes to selecting a builder for your dream home, it's essential to consider not only the quality of their projects but also their track record in handling disputes and legal matters. Today, we will delve into AVP Reality Limited, a builder based in Uttar Pradesh, and highlight important information for potential buyers.
AVP Reality Limited has a minimal yet notable legal history, having faced one complaint that culminated in a loss. With no won cases to its name, this situation raises questions for potential buyers regarding the builder's reliability and commitment to customer satisfaction.
In the lone case reported against AVP Reality Limited, the appellant claimed that the delay in filing the appeal was due to unavoidable circumstances and bonafide reasons. In contrast, the respondent (AVP Reality Limited) maintained that the appellant was unaware of the original order, which led to the delay. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed, citing a lack of sufficient cause for this delay. This case suggests potential issues related to communication and awareness surrounding project developments and legal commitments.
Based on the provided data, AVP Reality Limited presents a concerning picture for prospective buyers. The single complaint leading to a loss, paired with an absence of won cases, raises questions about their operational transparency and customer service.
In conclusion, while AVP Reality Limited operates in Uttar Pradesh, it is crucial for potential buyers to tread with caution, given their current legal standing. Making informed decisions based on comprehensive research can safeguard your investment and ensure a smoother experience in your home buying journey.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder AVP Reality Limited, which it lost, reveals important insights concerning the nature of disputes and the factors that contributed to these losses. These cases, though limited in number, highlight recurring themes in the builder's litigation approach.
Firstly, grouping the different kinds of cases under common themes, we observe several significant areas of conflict. One notable theme is the 'Delay in Filing Appeals,' where the builder contended that unavoidable circumstances prevented timely submissions. However, this was often countered by claims of non-compliance with original court orders, illustrating legal misalignment. Similarly, the disputes surrounding 'Project Delays and Consequences' emerged as a common point of contention, with the builder attempting to shift the blame for delays onto other parties involved. This pattern denotes a tendency to contest penalties that arise from operational inefficiencies. Lastly, issues related to 'Legal Misunderstandings' appear where complexities in regulation or land classification raised significant challenges for the builder during court proceedings.
Furthermore, examining the common reasons behind the builder's litigation activities, it is evident that AVP Reality Limited frequently contested penalties imposed for delays, aiming to shield itself from financial repercussions. Additionally, the builder's objections often stemmed from disagreements over project timelines that they attributed to external factors, as well as conflicts related to land classification or regulatory compliance issues. These triggers for litigation suggest an ongoing struggle to adhere to legal frameworks and operational commitments, ultimately pointing towards a reactive approach rather than a proactive compliance strategy.
A detailed examination of these cases reveals several fundamental reasons contributing to the builder's losses in court. Often, AVP Reality Limited faced challenges due to insufficient evidence substantiating their claims or defenses. There were instances of non-compliance with legal or regulatory directives, which exhibited failures in maintaining required standards or following established protocols. Moreover, a frequent inability to comprehend and apply land or project classification rules resulted in misunderstandings that were detrimental during proceedings. Ultimately, these factors highlight the need for builders to adopt a more thorough and compliant approach when navigating legal disputes to safeguard their interests.
This structure effectively outlines the key themes surrounding the builder's litigation and provides a comprehensive analysis of the outcomes and potential implications for future conduct in the real estate market.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!