CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
When it comes to real estate purchasing, potential buyers depend heavily on the reputation of builders. In this blog post, we will explore the Axis Bank Kodambakkam Loan Centre, located in Tamil Nadu, analyzing their legal performance, addressing complaints, and providing key insights for prospective purchasers.
The Axis Bank Kodambakkam Loan Centre has faced a total of two complaints which have resulted in loss of both cases against them. This statistic raises concerns about their reliability and the quality of their services in the property market.
In the legal sphere, the cases against Axis Bank Kodambakkam Loan Centre reveal significant patterns:
It is important to note that while the authority directed refunds, the fact that the builder did not win any cases points to a pattern of failures in fulfilling legal obligations which could be alarming for potential buyers.
Based on the provided data, the Axis Bank Kodambakkam Loan Centre does not present a favorable outlook for prospective buyers. With a history of lost cases and complaints specifically alleging non-compliance with regulatory standards, there is a clear warning for customers considering investments with them.
In conclusion, potential buyers should exercise caution when considering engaging with Axis Bank Kodambakkam Loan Centre and apply due diligence to safeguard their interests in any real estate transaction.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against the builder which it lost revealed several key themes across the complaints raised by the purchasers of plots. The primary disputes revolve around claims for refunds based on the perceived violations of the Tamil Nadu Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, particularly Section 12, which deals with the responsibilities of promoters in the real estate projects.
The cases highlight a common pattern where the complainants sought refunds of the amounts they had paid towards their plot purchases, alleging that the builder had failed to execute the sale deeds within the stipulated timelines. The builder, on the other hand, consistently claimed that the sale period had expired and that the buyers had not fulfilled their part of the agreement by paying the balance sale consideration within the 90-day window provided.
The underlying reason for the disputes appears to stem from a combination of factors, including misunderstandings about the payment timelines and the obligations set forth in the purchase agreements. Buyers commonly brought cases to court in this scenario because they felt aggrieved by the builder’s failure to deliver timely execution of the sale deeds, which is critical in real estate transactions as it transfers ownership officially.
The builder’s defense often revolved around the expired sale period and the buyers' alleged non-compliance with payment requirements. However, the verdicts did not favor the builder, indicating that the authority found sufficient grounds to support the buyers' claims of violations of the RERA Act and failure to meet contractual obligations.
In each case, the final verdict directed the builder to refund the amounts paid by the complainants before a specified deadline, reinforcing the commitment to protecting the rights of homebuyers under the law. The outcomes suggest that the builder's losses in these cases might be attributed to insufficient evidence supporting their claims of buyer non-compliance or a misunderstanding of their obligations under the RERA Act.
Overall, these cases illustrate the challenges and disputes that can arise in real estate transactions, particularly when there are misunderstandings about critical timelines and contractual requirements. They serve as a reminder to both builders and buyers to adhere to their obligations and to seek legal counsel when necessary to enforce their rights.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!