CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Buying property is a significant investment, and choosing the right builder is a crucial step in ensuring a smooth real estate transaction. One builder that has garnered attention in Haryana is Bakir Real Estate Private Limited. In this blog post, we'll delve into the builder’s track record based solely on available complaint data and legal case outcomes to provide potential buyers with informed insights.
Bakir Real Estate Private Limited is a property developer operating in Haryana. While they may be involved in multiple projects, the available data indicates a concerning legal history concerning their dealings with clients.
The sole complaint lodged against Bakir Real Estate involved delays in the possession of a commercial unit. The complainant sought compensation, while Bakir Real Estate contended that they had adhered to their contractual obligations regarding possession. However, the ruling favored the complainant, as the authority determined that the offer of possession was invalid because it was made prior to the issuance of the occupation certificate. As a result, the complainant was entitled to a delayed possession charge at the prescribed rate of interest.
Based on the information available, Bakir Real Estate Private Limited has a single complaint against it, which they lost due to an inability to meet contractual obligations concerning possession timelines. The evidence points to potential difficulties for future buyers regarding the reliability and legal compliance of this builder.
Tips for Potential BuyersIn conclusion, while Bakir Real Estate offers properties in Haryana, potential buyers should remain cautious and informed, especially given their current legal standing.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Bakir Real Estate Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolved around two main topics: delayed possession claims and non-compliance with municipal orders.
The delayed possession claims stemmed from the builder's failure to provide timely possession of commercial units to the complainants. In the sole case summarized, the complainant sought compensation for the delay, asserting that the builder had not obtained the necessary occupation certificate at the time of offering possession. This highlights a common reason for disputes in real estate transactions, where builders may attempt to fulfill their obligations prematurely without ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements.
The underlying reason for these delays can often be attributed to a variety of factors, including mismanagement, unforeseen circumstances, or a lack of adherence to project timelines. In the case of Bakir Real Estate, the builder's defense—that the offer of possession was made as per the agreement—indicates a potential misunderstanding or oversight regarding the necessity for the occupation certificate. Such certificates are crucial for verifying that a property is ready for occupation, and their absence can lead to significant legal consequences, as seen in this case.
The pattern that emerges from this case suggests that one of the most common triggers for litigation involves the builder’s non-compliance with critical regulatory requirements. Delays in obtaining necessary certificates or approvals can result in delayed possession, leading aggrieved buyers to seek compensation through legal means.
The builder's loss in these cases typically arises from their inability to fulfill contractual obligations, particularly concerning timely delivery and the requisite documentation for property occupation. Insufficient evidence to support their claims of valid possession offers, combined with a lack of compliance with municipal orders and regulations, has resulted in legal repercussions.
In conclusion, the cases against Bakir Real Estate Private Limited serve as a cautionary tale for potential buyers. They highlight the importance of ensuring that builders are in compliance with all regulatory requirements and that they do not overlook critical documentation before making possession offers. Buyers should remain vigilant and informed about their rights, actively requesting evidence of occupation certificates or similar approvals before accepting property deliveries.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!