| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the realm of real estate, choosing a reliable builder can make all the difference in ensuring a smooth purchasing process and a satisfactory investment. This blog post delves into Balaji Builders and Developers, exploring their track record through various legal cases that highlight key performance indicators.
Overview of Balaji Builders and Developers
Balaji Builders and Developers is an established builder operating primarily in two states: Chhattisgarh and Karnataka. However, they have been the subject of numerous legal complaints, with a total of 35 complaints filed against them. Out of these, they have won 7 cases and lost 28 cases, giving us a significant insight into their operational conduct and compliance with industry regulations.
Legal Case Overview
Winning Cases
Balaji Builders has successfully won 1 case where they filed against a complaint alleging a violation of the RERA Act. In that instance, they were penalized with a Rs. …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Balaji Builders and Developers, which it lost, revealed significant insights into the builder's operational practices and the common themes that emerged in these disputes.
The cases can be broadly categorized into several types, including delayed possession claims, refund disputes, project completion issues, non-compliance with RERA, and contractual disputes. Many of the complaints were centered around the builder's failure to complete projects on time or at all, leading to multiple claims for refunds and possession dates that were never honored.
A prevalent reason for litigation in these cases was the builder's inability to meet contractual obligations, particularly concerning timely delivery and quality assurance of residential units. Complainants often found themselves in precarious situations after having made full payments for flats that were never completed or handed over. This led to a series of claims where buyers contested the builder’s practices, arguing that their …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, BALAJI BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS, which it won, revealed the following information.
The disputes primarily fall into two key themes: Regulatory Non-compliance and Advertising and Marketing Errors. The builder faced claims alleging violations of the RERA Act, specifically related to the omission of the RERA registration number in a classified advertisement. This showcases the builder's engagements in legal matters primarily arising from regulatory obligations.
The reasons for the builder filing these cases often relate to contesting penalties imposed by regulatory bodies for inadvertent mistakes and disputing claims about non-compliance. Patterns indicate that the builder generally faced accusations that stemmed from minor oversights rather than significant violations of law.
In the instances where BALAJI BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS won, the common reasons highlighted include insufficient substantiation of claims from the opposing party, demonstrating compliance with legal frameworks despite minor errors, and effectively …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, BALAJI BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The disputes filed against this builder can be grouped under a few common themes. Firstly, there are several 'Delayed Possession Claims', which involve the claimants contesting the builder's responsibility for the promoter's inability to complete projects on time. Secondly, 'Regulatory Compliance Disputes' center around allegations related to non-compliance with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Thirdly, 'Refund and Interest Disputes' arise when buyers seek refunds and claim interest on the amounts they paid, especially in cases of project delays.
Many of these cases were brought to court primarily due to contestations over penalties related to project timelines and compliance. Buyers often sought relief from RERA decisions, claiming unfair treatment, especially concerning the builder's obligations for timely project completion and refund policies. This indicates a pattern of …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!