BALAJI ENTERPRISE logo

BALAJI ENTERPRISE

5.0/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Uttar Pradesh
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

When choosing a builder for your dream home, it's crucial to assess their reputation, experience, and track record in legal matters. In this blog, we will delve into the performance of Balaji Enterprise based on ownership of complaints and legal outcomes, particularly within the state of Uttar Pradesh.

Overview of Balaji Enterprise

Balaji Enterprise operates primarily in Uttar Pradesh and has navigated through a legal framework that sheds light on their business practices. Despite having received a single complaint, they emerged victorious in that case, demonstrating a commendable legal standing.

Legal Case Insights

Cases Won
  • Total Cases Won: 1
  • Details of Case: The appellant contested the Adjudicating Officer's right to grant interest for delayed possession. The tribunal ruled in favor of Balaji Enterprise, asserting that the Adjudicating Officer lacked the jurisdiction to award such compensation. This outcome indicates that Balaji Enterprise has a robust understanding of legal jurisdictions which …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Jurisdiction Disputes Compensation for Delays

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily revolve around themes such as 'Delayed Possession Claims', 'Jurisdiction Disputes', and 'Compensation for Delays'. These themes encapsulate a broader spectrum of legal challenges faced by developers in the real estate sector.

In cases categorized under 'Delayed Possession Claims', the builder often contends that delays in possession were due to circumstances outside its control, bringing forth cases to dispute imposed penalties or claims from buyers. The 'Jurisdiction Disputes' theme highlights conflicts regarding the authority of adjudicating officers, where the builder successfully argued that certain claims exceeded the jurisdiction of those adjudicating officers. Lastly, the 'Compensation for Delays' category showcases the builder's position that claims for interest or compensation for delays were not valid, leading to further litigation.

The common triggers for these litigations include disputes over …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review