| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the competitive landscape of real estate, understanding the reputation and legal standing of a builder is paramount for potential homebuyers. This blog post focuses on Bapa Sitaram Developers—a builder primarily operating in Gujarat. While they have a limited track record with regard to legal complaints, a closer examination reveals nuances that may affect prospective clients.
Legal Case Overview
Bapa Sitaram Developers has recorded one legal case, which they ultimately lost.
Case Details
- Appellant's Claim: The appellant asserted that Bapa Sitaram Developers did not timely submit the quarterly report for their project "Madhav Anand Jyot,” violating the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act of 2016.
- Respondent's Defense: The builder contended that the delay was attributable to their consultant's absence as they had relocated to Canada and were unreachable.
- Verdict: As a consequence of the delay in filing, Bapa Sitaram Developers was fined Rs. 10,000.
Analysis of Legal Cases
Patterns …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Bapa Sitaram Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into regulatory compliance issues and delay-related disputes.
The first theme, regulatory compliance issues, encompasses the builder's failure to adhere to the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. In one notable case, the builder was penalized for not filing the quarterly report for their project 'Madhav Anand Jyot' on time. This highlights a pattern of non-compliance with statutory obligations, which reflects a lack of diligence on the part of the builder.
Delay-related disputes constitute another significant theme. In the case mentioned, the builder attributed the late filing of the quarterly report to the unavailability of a consultant who had traveled to Canada. This indicates a tendency for the builder to blame project delays on other parties rather than taking responsibility themselves. Such deflection is …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!