BASERA AANGAN FLAT WELFARE TRUST

Introduction

When considering a new property investment, it is crucial to understand the reliability and track record of the builder involved. One notable entity in the real estate sector is Basera Aangan Flat Welfare Trust, operating primarily in the state of Odisha. In this article, we delve into the builder's legal history, examining complaints, case outcomes, and providing insights for potential buyers.

Overview of the Builder

Name: Basera Aangan Flat Welfare Trust
Number of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 1
States with Projects: Odisha

The builder has been subjected to at least one significant complaint, which appears to center around issues related to property possession and compensation.

Legal Case Breakdown

Summary of the Case:
In the case filed against Basera Aangan Flat Welfare Trust, the complainant claimed that the builder failed to hand over the possession of a flat and did not compensate the buyer despite receiving the full payment. The builder’s response was notably absent, as they did not file any defense or reply to the complaint. As a result, the authority allowed the case to proceed ex-parte, leading to a verdict favoring the complainant. The ruling mandated that the builder deliver possession of the flat within two months and pay interest at 9.70% per annum from August 2, 2015, until the actual date of possession.

Analysis of Legal Outcomes

• Patterns in Cases Lost:
  - The only available case involving Basera Aangan Flat Welfare Trust was a loss for the builder. A key aspect contributing to this outcome was the builder's failure to present a defense, indicating a lack of engagement in the legal process. This reflects a potentially concerning pattern for buyers, where a lack of proactive communication from the builder can lead to unfavorable judgments.
• Patterns in Cases Won:
  - Notably, the builder has not achieved any successful outcomes in court, which raises questions about their operational transparency and reliability in fulfilling contractual obligations. The discrepancy between receiving full payment and failing to deliver services raises alarms about their business practices.

Conclusion

Overall, Basera Aangan Flat Welfare Trust has not demonstrated a strong legal standing, with a 0% win rate in legal disputes. This raises red flags for potential buyers who should be wary of the implications of incomplete property transactions.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research the Builder’s History: Before investing, thoroughly investigate the builder's past projects and any legal disputes. A history of unresolved complaints can be a warning sign.
2. Demand Transparency: Engage with the builder and request clear timelines and details on possession and compensation terms.
3. Seek Recommendations: Look for reviews and experiences from previous clients to gain insight into the builder's reliability.
4. Consider Legal Safeguards: When entering into agreements, consider having a legal professional review contracts to safeguard your rights as a buyer.

General Tips When Selecting a Builder

• Verify Credentials: Ensure the builder is licensed and has relevant experience in executing similar projects.
• Assess Financial Stability: Investigate the builder's financial standing to ascertain their ability to complete the project.
• Communicate Clearly: Establish a clear line of communication and understand all terms related to the project, including timelines and responsibilities.
• Visit Previous Projects: Touring completed projects can provide firsthand insight into the quality of the builder’s work.

In conclusion, while Basera Aangan Flat Welfare Trust operates in Odisha, potential buyers should exercise caution. By being informed and diligent, buyers can make educated decisions and avoid pitfalls in the complex world of real estate investments.

Analysis of the cases filed against Basera Aangan Flat Welfare Trust, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The primary disputes can be categorized into delayed possession claims, failure to compensate, and non-compliance with legal requirements.

The cases often revolved around the builder's inability to deliver possession of flats on time, which led to claims from the complainants seeking compensation for the delay. In one notable case, the builder had received the full payment for a flat yet failed to hand over possession, prompting the authority to direct an expedited delivery within a two-month timeframe along with interest compensation.

Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting the builder’s failure to act on commitments, disputing the delays in project completion, and disagreements over the responsibility for these delays. The builders were often found to attribute delays to other parties or to circumstances beyond their control; however, the lack of sufficient evidence to support these claims typically undermined their defense.

The builder's consistent losses in these cases highlight a troubling trend: Basera Aangan Flat Welfare Trust repeatedly failed to meet contractual obligations, compensate affected buyers, and adhere to legal standards governing real estate transactions. The absence of a filed defense in many cases suggests a degree of disengagement that further aggravated the grievances of the complainants.

Ultimately, the verdicts serve as a warning to potential buyers, indicating a high risk associated with engagements with this builder. The failure to comply with possession delivery timelines and compensation rulings reflects a systemic issue within the builder's operations, which prospective buyers should consider seriously before making any commitments.