CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the complex world of real estate, choosing a builder can be a daunting task for potential buyers. One such builder, Benefit Reality, operates primarily in the state of Gujarat. With a limited number of complaints and legal cases, it is essential to delve deeper into their track record to assess their reliability and reputation.
Benefit Reality has had a total of 1 complaint registered against them, with 0 cases won and 1 case lost. This sparse legal history raises questions about the builder's operational practices and potential pitfalls for buyers considering their services.
Examining the legal case against Benefit Reality reveals important insights into their practices:
The loss encountered by Benefit Reality stems from a violation of a specific regulatory requirement (RERA). This indicates a pattern where the builder might have overlooked essential compliance aspects that could affect buyer trust and safety. The fine, albeit relatively small, signals a need for increased diligence in adhering to advertising and regulatory standards.
As there are no cases won by Benefit Reality, it is challenging to identify any positive patterns or trends regarding successful outcomes. The absence of victories could suggest potential issues in their dealings or indicate that buyers have not pursued further legal recourse in other matters.
In summary, while Benefit Reality has a relatively low complaint rate, their single legal case, which resulted in a loss, raises concerns about their commitment to compliance and transparency. For potential buyers, this could indicate a risk in moving forward without further research.
In conclusion, while Benefit Reality shows potential, buyers must tread carefully and conduct thorough due diligence to ensure a safe and secure investment.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against the builder Benefit Reality, where the builder lost, revealed several key points across the various disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into two main themes: regulatory non-compliance and advertisement transparency.
In terms of regulatory non-compliance, the builder faced penalties for violating the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, particularly Section 11(2), which deals with the mandatory disclosure of information on the RERA website. The promoter's omission of the RERA website address from advertisements led to a fine, indicating a lack of adherence to regulatory requirements.
Advertisement transparency is another significant theme, as the builder's advertisements were called into question when they were perceived as misleading or incomplete. The promoter's claim that the advertisement was only for Diwali greetings and that the RERA website address was not intentionally omitted highlights an important issue in project marketing—ensuring that promotional materials are clear and compliant with regulations.
Common reasons for bringing cases against the builder include regulatory breaches and lack of transparency in project advertising. People may contest penalties imposed for non-compliance or dispute the builder's representation of projects. A pattern emerges where the builder's litigation often stems from a failure to acknowledge regulatory obligations or to fulfill them adequately.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence supporting their claims of compliance and transparency. The fact that the authority fined the promoter for violating RERA guidelines demonstrates a systemic issue where the builder may not have understood or may have disregarded legal requirements. Such cases underline the importance of education and compliance in the real estate sector to avoid legal repercussions and maintain transparency.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!