CIN | U45200RJ2020PLC069078 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | 80/15 MANSAROVER , JAIPUR, Rajasthan, India - 302005 |
Company Status | Public |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the realm of real estate, the integrity and reliability of builders play a crucial role in ensuring that buyers make informed decisions. Bharatavas Yojna Limited is one such builder based in Rajasthan, with a notable legal history. This blog aims to analyze the builder's legal standings through the lens of complaints, legal cases, and the implications for potential buyers.
Bharatavas Yojna Limited has received a total of 1 formal complaint, which culminated in a single legal case. The outcome of this case was unfavorable for the builder, highlighting their current legal challenges.
Bharatavas Yojna Limited has lost 1 case, which revolves around non-compliance with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. The specific allegations included the failure to display the registration number of the projects and the Authority's website in their advertisements. While the builder contended that this omission was a genuine mistake as they acted as a registered real estate agent, the authority ruled against them. The result of this case was a substantial penalty of Rs. 5,00,000, emphasizing the importance of compliance in the advertising and promotion of real estate projects.
In sum, Bharatavas Yojna Limited's single legal case and its result exemplify the importance of adhering to the regulations set forth in the real estate sector. For potential buyers wary of legal complications, it becomes imperative to carefully consider the builder’s track record, especially in compliance with regulatory standards.
Ultimately, while Bharatavas Yojna Limited’s current standings raise some concerns, thorough research and due diligence can help prospective buyers navigate their purchasing decisions with greater confidence.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Bharatavas Yojna Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The primary disputes can be categorized into regulatory non-compliance and advertisement misrepresentation.
In terms of regulatory non-compliance, the builder faced penalties for violating the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Specifically, the Authority claimed that the builder failed to mention the registration number of the project and the website address of the Authority in advertisements. This highlights a troubling trend where builders may not fully adhere to the regulatory requirements established to protect consumers and maintain transparency in the real estate market.
The reason people commonly bring such cases to court is to contest the builder's lack of compliance, which can lead to significant penalties, as seen in this instance where the builder was fined Rs. 5,00,000. The builder’s defense—that the omission was a bonafide mistake—was not accepted, indicating that the courts take a serious view of regulatory violations, even if claimed to be accidental.
The conclusion drawn from these summaries is that one of the most common triggers for litigation involving this builder is their failure to align with legal standards, particularly in advertising practices. The builder’s losses in these cases stem from insufficient evidence to support their claims of accidental non-compliance and a lack of adherence to the interim directions that could have prevented the violations.
Overall, these cases serve as a warning to potential buyers about the importance of scrutinizing a builder's regulatory compliance and transparency practices before making any purchase decisions.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!