CIN | U45201OR2012PTC015357 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | PLOT NO-N1/275, GROUND FLOOR, IRC VILLAGE NAYAPALLI, NEAR MILLENNIUM EYE HOSPITAL , BHUBANESWAR, Orissa, India - 751015 |
Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the realm of real estate, selecting a reliable builder is paramount. Unfortunately, not every builder earns a stellar reputation. Boudha Infra Ventures Private Limited, operational primarily in Odisha, has garnered attention for a troubling track record in legal disputes with customers. This article delves into their performance, shedding light on patterns in their legal battles and offering insights for potential buyers.
Boudha Infra Ventures Private Limited has faced a total of 14 complaints, with an alarming 0 cases won and a disappointing 14 cases lost. This paints a concerning picture for a builder that has encountered numerous legal issues without a single victory in court.
The nature of the complaints against Boudha Infra Ventures reveals a troubling trend:
Interestingly, Boudha Infra Ventures has not won any cases to date. This absence of favorable outcomes reflects not only a lack of legal success but also a significant failing in addressing client grievances adequately.
Given the extensive list of complaints and the dismal record in legal outcomes, potential buyers should exercise extreme caution when considering a purchase from Boudha Infra Ventures Private Limited. The pattern of repeated legal losses is a red flag, suggesting systemic issues in their operational practices or customer service.
In summary, Boudha Infra Ventures Private Limited represents a cautionary tale in the construction sector. By remaining vigilant and informed, potential buyers can safeguard their investment and ensure a smoother home-buying experience.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Boudha Infra Ventures Private Limited, which it lost, revealed significant insights into the builder's operational practices and legal disputes. The cases primarily revolved around three critical themes: the cancellation of registered sale deeds, the provision of intercom facilities, and issues surrounding completion certificates.
The first theme, cancellation of registered sale deeds, indicates a substantial concern regarding the builder's management of property transactions. Complainants often claimed that the builder had incorrectly or prematurely canceled sale deeds, which suggests a lack of diligence in handling legal documents and customer agreements.
The second theme focused on the provision of intercom facilities. This highlights an essential requirement in modern residential complexes, where communication systems are crucial for safety and convenience. The builder's failure to deliver these facilities as promised reflects a pattern of neglecting important details that enhance living experiences.
The third theme, related to completion certificates, reveals a broader issue regarding the builder's compliance with regulatory requirements. The repeated claims that the builder had not obtained necessary completion and occupancy certificates indicate a fundamental disregard for the legal framework surrounding real estate development. This not only jeopardizes the builder's credibility but also raises concerns about the safety and legitimacy of the properties developed.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases include the builder's failure to fulfill contractual obligations, particularly concerning the provision of required facilities and proper documentation. The patterns emerging from these disputes demonstrate a consistent trigger: the builder’s inability or reluctance to meet standards that are expected in real estate transactions and development projects.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to a combination of factors. The repeated claims of having obtained completion certificates, which were not substantiated with evidence, suggest a significant misrepresentation of facts. Furthermore, the failure to address critical issues like intercom facilities and deed cancellations reflects a non-compliant approach to real estate management. Together, these factors underline a lack of accountability and transparency in the builder's operations, leading to multiple legal losses.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!