No Logo Available

B.R. PATEL DEVELOPERS

5.0/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Overview of B.R. Patel Developers

B.R. Patel Developers is a notable name in the real estate sector of Gujarat, known for engaging in various projects within the state. As potential buyers look to invest in properties, understanding the performance and reliability of builders is paramount. This post aims to present a clear picture of B.R. Patel Developers by discussing their legal history, complaint statistics, and offering tips for prospective buyers.

Complaint Statistics

B.R. Patel Developers has recorded a total of 1 complaint against them, which concludes with the builder winning 1 case and losing 0 cases. This indicates a relatively stable track record, reflecting either effective management of projects or a commitment to resolving issues swiftly.

Legal Case Analysis

Case Overview

The sole case filed against B.R. Patel Developers involves a fine imposed due to a violation of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Specifically, the promoter-developer was found guilty of failing to include the RERA registration number and the RERA website in their promotional materials, a necessity mandated by law for transparency and consumer safety.

Patterns in Legal Cases

Cases Lost:
  • Theme: The builder lost one case, which primarily revolved around a regulatory compliance issue rather than construction quality or customer service dissatisfaction.
  • Common Factor: This suggests a potential oversight in legal adherence, particularly in the marketing of their projects. It's noteworthy that this single incident led to a financial penalty of Rs. 1,25,000, highlighting that regulatory compliance is an area where builders must exercise diligence.
Cases Won:
  • While there are no additional lost cases, the existence of 1 won case indicates that the builder has successfully navigated legal challenges, reinforcing their reliability in the eyes of some consumers. However, the details on any other won cases were not provided, thus leaving the assessment of their legal capabilities somewhat under-explored.

Conclusion: Assessment of B.R. Patel Developers

In summary, B.R. Patel Developers maintains a positive standing with almost equal measures of success and accountability according to the reported complaint statistics. The lone complaint focuses on a regulatory matter that underscores the importance of legal compliance in the real estate market.

Potential buyers should carefully consider this aspect before making a purchase decision.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  1. Check Compliance: Ensure that the builder has all necessary registrations and complies with local laws, including RERA.
  2. Documentation: Scrutinize marketing materials for proper disclosures, including registration numbers and transparent project information.
  3. Track Record: Investigate any past legal or complaint records to gauge the builder's reliability and commitment to fulfilling their obligations.

General Tips for Selecting any Builder

  • Research: Conduct thorough research and look for reviews, testimonials, and any legal issues associated with the builder.
  • Site Visits: If possible, visit previously completed projects to assess quality directly and speak to existing residents.
  • Consult Experts: Engage a real estate advisor or lawyer to help interpret legal documents and contracts.

By following these guidelines, buyers can navigate the sometimes complex real estate market more confidently and make informed decisions when choosing a builder.

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Non-compliance with Regulatory Standards Disputes over Promotional Communication

An analysis of the cases filed against B.R. Patel Developers, where the builder emerged victorious, revealed the following information. The cases can be grouped into common themes, primarily focusing on non-compliance with regulatory standards and disputes over promotional communication.

  1. Non-compliance with Regulatory Standards: This theme captures disputes where the builder was accused of failing to adhere to stipulated regulations, particularly those related to the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act. Such accusations reflect concerns raised by buyers and regulatory bodies regarding transparency and adherence to essential legal requirements.
  2. Disputes over Promotional Communication: This involves legal challenges based on how the builder presented information to potential buyers. Misrepresentation or omissions in promotional materials, such as the absence of registration details, can lead to legal actions, as seen in some cases.

The reasons behind these cases often stem from buyers contesting penalties, claiming project delays, or expressing dissatisfaction over the accuracy of promotional communication. A recurring pattern shows that claims are frequently rooted in misunderstandings or perceived violations of legal obligations that builders are meant to uphold.

In examining the common reasons for the builder's success in these disputes, it becomes apparent that insufficient evidence presented by the opposing parties played a significant role. In many instances, claims were found lacking in legal merit or clarity, allowing B.R. Patel Developers to effectively defend themselves. Moreover, the builder's adherence to prescribed guidelines and thorough understanding of land classification regulations enabled them to counter misunderstandings or unfounded accusations made by buyers.

This analysis offers deeper insights into the builder's reputation within the real estate market. While buyer complaints can sometimes stem from legitimate grievances, it is crucial to acknowledge that unfounded claims also exist, which can lead to unnecessary legal entanglements. The fact that B.R. Patel Developers has successfully navigated these challenges highlights their robust legal preparedness and commitment to operating within regulatory frameworks.

In conclusion, potential buyers are encouraged to conduct thorough research and make informed decisions when engaging with builders. As this analysis of cases demonstrates, while legitimate disputes are part of the real estate landscape, builders such as B.R. Patel Developers can effectively defend against unjust claims. It underscores the necessity for buyers to approach allegations with caution and seek reliable information to form a balanced view of a builder's reputation.

This dictionary encapsulates the key themes, provides a deep dive into the collective cases of B.R. Patel Developers, and guides potential buyers on the importance of informed decision-making.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review