CIN | U45203TG1998PLC029154 |
---|---|
Year Established | 31 March 1998 |
Address | M. No. 8-2-502/1/A, JIVI Towers, Road No. 7, Banjara Hills , Hyderabad, Telangana, India - 500034 |
Company Status | Public |
BSCPL Infrastructure Limited is a construction company based in Tamil Nadu. As potential buyers explore their options in the real estate market, examining the track record of builders becomes essential for making informed decisions. This blog post delves into the complaint history and legal performance of BSCPL Infrastructure Limited based on available data.
To date, there has been one recorded case against BSCPL Infrastructure, which has not favored the builder. The details of the case reveal that the appellant claimed issues regarding the removal of an underground common water pipeline that could potentially burden other residents. Meanwhile, the respondents, associated with BSCPL, contended that they had fulfilled their financial obligations for amenities, including essential water and sewerage facilities. Ultimately, this case was lost by BSCPL, leading to the appellant's claims being upheld.
The only case lost by BSCPL Infrastructure Limited illustrates a pattern where builder accountability in communal living conditions is critically examined. The case revolved around the amenities provided to residents, suggesting that a failure in communication and planning can lead to significant disputes. This may signal to potential buyers the importance of understanding not just the physical attributes of a property but the implications of shared services in a residential development.
Conversely, BSCPL won another related case where the appellate association’s claims were dismissed. In this case, the court recognized the claims made by the respondents, reinforcing their entitlement to the amenities off the basis of having paid for them. Such outcomes reveal the company’s stance on maintaining contractual rights when obligations are met.
Based on the available data, BSCPL Infrastructure Limited presents a mixed legal background. While the company has won a case related to entitlement and contractual fulfillment, the loss of a case concerning resident shared amenities raises concerns about their community engagement and living standards. Thus, potential buyers should approach with a critical lens and consider the implications of such litigation outcomes.
By weighing the pros and cons and adhering to the suggested evaluations, potential buyers can take informed steps toward a satisfactory purchase with BSCPL Infrastructure Limited or any builder they consider.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against BSCPL INFRASTRUCTURE Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key insights into the nature of the disputes faced by the builder. The primary theme emerging from these cases centers around disputes over amenities and facilities, particularly concerning water and sewerage facilities provided in residential townships.
In the reported case, the respondents claimed that having paid for their villa along with the requisite costs for amenities, they were entitled to receive water and sewerage facilities. The builder's defense suggested a lack of due diligence on the part of the purchasers regarding the underground common water pipeline. However, the final verdict favored the respondents, indicating a legal expectation that buyers should receive promised amenities without inconvenience.
A common reason for litigation in these cases appears to be the builder's failure to deliver promised facilities or the imposition of conditions that could potentially disrupt the provision of these essential services. Buyers may feel aggrieved when they perceive that the builder is not fulfilling contractual obligations, especially regarding critical utilities like water supply.
The builder's loss in these cases often stems from a combination of factors. Insufficient evidence to support their claims of adequate provision of amenities, or a lack of compliance with regulatory requirements governing the supply of water and sewerage, can undermine their defense. Furthermore, a failure to adhere to interim directions from courts or regulatory bodies can result in legal repercussions, as can misunderstandings regarding the obligations to provide specific facilities in a township setting.
In summary, BSCPL INFRASTRUCTURE Limited's losses in court highlight the importance of transparency and adherence to commitments made to homebuyers, particularly in relation to essential amenities. Buyers should take note of these legal disputes when considering purchases in residential projects, ensuring they are informed about the builder's obligations and their own legal rights.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Appeal No.23 of 2024 | Tamil Nadu | The appellant association filed an appeal against… | ["Water and sewerag… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant association cl… | Bollineni Hillside … | BSCPL Infrastructur… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1a1bUZnBK5Q0iR9RHANRT7kaJk0i7JO_t |