| CIN | U45203TG1998PLC029154 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | M. No. 8-2-502/1/A, JIVI Towers, Road No. 7, Banjara Hills , Hyderabad, Telangana, India - 500034 |
| Company Status | Public |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
BSCPL Infrastructure Limited is a construction company based in Tamil Nadu. As potential buyers explore their options in the real estate market, examining the track record of builders becomes essential for making informed decisions. This blog post delves into the complaint history and legal performance of BSCPL Infrastructure Limited based on available data.
Overview of Legal Cases
Cases Against BSCPL Infrastructure
To date, there has been one recorded case against BSCPL Infrastructure, which has not favored the builder. The details of the case reveal that the appellant claimed issues regarding the removal of an underground common water pipeline that could potentially burden other residents. Meanwhile, the respondents, associated with BSCPL, contended that they had fulfilled their financial obligations for amenities, including essential water and sewerage facilities. Ultimately, this case was lost by BSCPL, leading to the appellant's claims being upheld.
Analysis of the Litigation Outcomes
Cases Lost
The only …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against BSCPL INFRASTRUCTURE Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key insights into the nature of the disputes faced by the builder. The primary theme emerging from these cases centers around disputes over amenities and facilities, particularly concerning water and sewerage facilities provided in residential townships.
In the reported case, the respondents claimed that having paid for their villa along with the requisite costs for amenities, they were entitled to receive water and sewerage facilities. The builder's defense suggested a lack of due diligence on the part of the purchasers regarding the underground common water pipeline. However, the final verdict favored the respondents, indicating a legal expectation that buyers should receive promised amenities without inconvenience.
A common reason for litigation in these cases appears to be the builder's failure to deliver promised facilities or the imposition of conditions that could potentially disrupt the provision of …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!