BULLAND BUILDTHECH PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the realm of real estate, the reputation of builders can significantly influence buyer decisions. BULLAND BUILDTHECH Private Limited, operating primarily in Uttar Pradesh, offers a case study for prospective buyers. This post delves into the builder’s performance based on the limited legal data available, highlighting their track record and providing essential tips for potential buyers.

Overview of Legal Performance

BULLAND BUILDTHECH has encountered a total of 1 legal complaint. While the builder has won 0 cases, they have lost 1 case. Such a legal history raises red flags regarding the builder's reliability and the quality of their customer service.

Analyzing Legal Cases

The sole case against BULLAND BUILDTHECH presents several interesting points:

• Appellant's Claim: The appellant approached the RERA (Real Estate Regulatory Authority) concerning possession issues and sought interest for delays.
• Builder's Defense: BULLAND BUILDTHECH claimed that the appellant was related to another complainant, suggesting a potential bias or interest conflict.
• Final Verdict: The Tribunal decided to examine related complaints involving the same builder, indicating a pattern where issues may be interconnected.

From this data, we see that the nature of complaints involves possession disputes, which can be a common pain point in real estate transactions. The loss in this case suggests potential shortcomings in the builder’s handling of delivery timelines, a critical aspect for prospective homeowners.

Patterns in Legal Outcomes

Cases Lost

The lost case reflects a fundamental issue often cited in construction disputes: delays in possession. Buyers frequently raise grievances when projects fail to meet deadline expectations. This signals that individuals considering BULLAND BUILDTHECH may need to prepare for potential delays if they choose to proceed with transactions.

Cases Won

Interestingly, the builder has not won any cases. This lack of victories could indicate either a challenge in proving their case or a consistent pattern of unresolved customer grievances, both of which could deter future buyers.

Conclusion

Based on the limited information available, BULLAND BUILDTHECH Private Limited's legal history raises significant concerns for potential buyers. With a record of lost cases and no victories, individuals must approach with caution. Here are some tips for prospective buyers:

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Conduct Thorough Research: Investigate not only the builder's previous projects but also any customer reviews and legal histories.
2. Seek Transparency: Ensure that the builder provides clear timelines for possession and delivery, along with penalties for delays.
3. Consider Legal Support: Engage with legal experts familiar with real estate to assist in navigating contracts.
4. Discuss Previous Cases: Inquire directly with the builder regarding past grievances and how they have managed customer concerns.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

• Licensing and Certification: Verify that the builder holds all necessary licenses and complies with RERA regulations.
• Physical Review of Projects: Visit completed projects to assess quality and craftsmanship first-hand.
• Ask for References: Speak with previous buyers to gauge satisfaction levels and any ongoing issues.
• Financial Stability: Evaluate the builder's financial health to ensure they can complete your project without delays.

In summary, while BULLAND BUILDTHECH Private Limited operates in Uttar Pradesh, the existing legal challenges suggest a careful approach is warranted. By doing thorough research and seeking clarity, buyers can make informed decisions vital for securing their investments.

Analysis of the cases filed against the builder Bulland Buildtech Private Limited, which it lost, revealed several key themes across the complaints raised by the appellants. The cases primarily revolved around delayed possession claims, with many customers expressing grievances over the builder's failure to deliver properties on time. This theme was particularly prevalent in the complaints filed by relatives of individuals associated with the builder, such as Shri Satish Jain and Smt. Laxmi Devi, highlighting a pattern where family members may have been affected by the builder's delays.

Common reasons for bringing these cases to court included contesting the builder's accountability for project delays and seeking interest compensation for the prolonged duration in which buyers were unable to receive possession of their homes. There were also instances where the builder's defense revolved around their assertion that certain complaints were not independent, rather they were clubbed with other family member complaints, indicating a potential defensive strategy to undermine the validity of individual claims.

The builder lost these cases primarily due to the tribunal's decision to consolidate complaints and analyze them together, which likely highlighted a consistent pattern of delays and dissatisfaction among buyers—particularly those related to key individuals, which may have indicated a systemic issue rather than isolated incidents. The verdicts did not specifically mention the builder's non-compliance with legal requirements or failure to provide evidence; however, the outcomes suggest that the tribunal found sufficient grounds in the complaints to rule against the builder, signaling a need for buyers to be vigilant and proactive in their rights when dealing with builders with a history of such disputes.