CIN | U70101GJ2014PTC078219 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | 53, NIRANT PARK SOCIETY OPP. SUN-N-STEP CLUB, THALTEJ, P.O.- GHATLODIA AHMEDABAD GJ 380061 IN |
Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the realm of real estate, choosing the right builder is pivotal for prospective homeowners. One such builder, CALICA BUILDWELL PRIVATE LIMITED, has been operating in Gujarat and has a mixed record in terms of legal complaints. This blog post delves into the history of complaints against CALICA BUILDWELL, examining their losses and wins in legal cases to provide an informed perspective for potential buyers.
CALICA BUILDWELL PRIVATE LIMITED has faced a total of 1 complaint, which they lost. At first glance, this may seem minor; however, it indicates some underlying issues that future buyers should consider. In addition, the builder has not won any legal cases, highlighting a possible trend of challenges faced in fulfilling their obligations to clients.
The sole legal case against CALICA BUILDWELL revolved around the claim from a complainant who asserted that the builder did not hand over possession of a flat, despite having received the sale document. The builder's defense was straightforward—they maintained that they did provide the sale document to the complainant. However, the court ultimately dismissed the case when the complainant was allowed to withdraw their plaint.
This pattern suggests potential issues with timely possession or communication between the builder and buyers. The dismissal of the case could imply complexities in the transaction that were not resolved satisfactorily for the complainant.
The loss of CALICA BUILDWELL in the single documented case reflects a disconnect between what was promised and what was delivered, particularly regarding the transfer of property possession. Such patterns might emerge from a gap in operational processes or customer service that needs addressing for improving buyer satisfaction moving forward.
Interestingly, the builder has not recorded any successful outcomes in their legal dealings. This absence could be indicative of broader issues within their project delivery or contractual management. Without any victories reported, it casts a shadow over their ability to effectively defend their practices against claims.
Based on the available data, CALICA BUILDWELL PRIVATE LIMITED presents a concerning profile for potential buyers in Gujarat. The single complaint lost, combined with no cases won, indicates that prospective homeowners should approach with caution. It is critical for buyers to conduct thorough due diligence, ensure they have robust contracts, and perhaps seek out recent testimonials or reviews from prior customers.
By keeping these factors in mind, buyers can better navigate their choices in the competitive real estate landscape.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Calica Buildwell Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The primary disputes can be categorized into two main topics: Delayed Possession Claims and Disputes over Sale Documentation.
In the case of Delayed Possession Claims, the complainant often cited that they had not received possession of their flat despite having completed the sale documentation. This indicates a significant concern for buyers regarding the builder's ability to deliver properties on time. Such claims usually arise from the builder's failure to meet project timelines and fulfill their commitments to buyers.
The second theme, Disputes over Sale Documentation, highlights issues related to the sale documents provided by the builder. In one notable case, the builder claimed to have given the sale document to the complainant, yet the complainant disputed this, leading to a withdrawal of the plaint and ultimately a dismissal of the case. This shows a troubling trend where buyers and builders may have differing accounts of documentation and transactions, leading to legal disputes that might stem from miscommunication or misinformation.
Common reasons for these legal actions include contesting what buyers perceive as delays in possession, discrepancies in documentation, and underlying issues of trust in the builder's transactions. The builder’s litigation often arises from an attempt to defend their actions, which implies that there may be systemic issues in their operational practices, particularly concerning transparency and communication with buyers.
The builder's losses in these cases can be attributed to several factors, most notably the inability to align their accounting of events and documentation with those of the buyers. Insufficient evidence to support their claims, combined with a lack of clarity in their documentation practices, likely contributed to the legal outcomes. Furthermore, the unique circumstance where the complainant was allowed to withdraw their plaint suggests that there might have been either a misunderstanding of the builder's obligations or a failure on the builder's part to uphold clear contractual agreements.
Overall, this analysis underscores the importance for potential buyers to exercise caution when engaging with Calica Buildwell Private Limited. It is crucial to ensure thorough documentation, clear communication, and a complete understanding of the builder's obligations before entering into any agreements. Buyers should also be aware of their rights and be prepared to address any discrepancies that may arise during the purchasing process.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!