Analysis of the cases filed against Canopy Granviz Developers, where the builder lost, reveals a consistent pattern of disputes primarily centered around the failure to comply with regulatory requirements, particularly concerning the submission of Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs) on the RERA web portal.

The cases can be grouped into several common themes. The predominant issue involves Failure to Submit Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs), which led to multiple cases where the builder was penalized for non-compliance. The reasons provided for this failure varied; often, the builder claimed to have submitted the reports, but they were not uploaded due to technical issues or other unspecified reasons. This highlights a significant communication or operational gap between the builder's reporting processes and the RERA's reporting requirements.

Penalties for Non-Compliance and Project Delays constitute another major theme. In these cases, the builder faced penalties not only for the delayed submission of QPRs but also for potential delays in project timelines, which could have implications for the buyers expecting timely possession of their properties. The builder's defense often revolved around claims of timely submissions or mitigating circumstances, which were not accepted by the Authority, leading to further penalties.

Technical Issues and Upload Failures stand out as a recurring excuse for the builder's failure to fulfill their reporting obligations. While it’s clear that technical problems can arise, the frequency with which Canopy Granviz Developers encountered these issues raises concerns about the stability and reliability of their reporting systems.

Lastly, the Revocation of Registration for Repeated Non-Compliance shows a serious consequence that the builder faced in several cases. This highlights the regulatory body's commitment to ensuring that builders comply with the necessary procedures to protect the interests of buyers and maintain transparency in the market.

In summary, the builder's losses in these cases primarily stem from insufficient evidence to support their claims of compliance, a lack of understanding of their obligations under the RERA, and a series of operational failures regarding report submissions. Buyers should take note of these patterns, as they indicate potential risks associated with investing in properties managed by Canopy Granviz Developers.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, CANOPY GRANVIZ DEVELOPERS, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

Several recurring themes emerged from the cases, primarily focused on non-compliance with Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs) and associated penalties for their delayed submission. Many complaints centered around allegations of the builder's failure to submit required QPRs on the RERA web portal, leading to penalties and potential revocation of registration.

The reasons for bringing these cases against the builder primarily stemmed from contested penalties, claims of project delays, and disagreements over the regulatory requirements. Numerous appella claimed that the builder had not submitted the requisite QPRs on time, thereby showing a pattern where buyers or regulatory bodies sought to enforce compliance through legal channels.

The builder won these cases due, in part, to insufficient evidence presented by the opposing parties. Many claims were challenged on grounds of the builder demonstrating compliance, claiming technical issues in submissions, or asserting that the submitted reports were not reflected correctly due to issues beyond their control. Furthermore, some appellants had failed to comply with interim directives or provided minimal evidence to substantiate their claims, allowing the builder to effectively defend itself.

This analysis showcases CANOPY GRANVIZ DEVELOPERS’ reputation in the real estate market, illustrating that it has successfully defended itself against accusations that may stem from misunderstandings or exaggerated claims made by buyers or other entities.

To potential buyers, it is crucial to remain vigilant and discerning. While legitimate disputes exist within the real estate sector, our analysis indicates builders like CANOPY GRANVIZ DEVELOPERS often uphold their defenses against unfounded claims. Consequently, buyers should approach allegations with caution, prioritizing reliable information and substantiated evidence before forming judgments regarding a builder's reputation.