| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the bustling real estate landscape of Rajasthan, CANOPY GRANVIZ DEVELOPERS stands out with a track record that merits closer examination. With a total of 75 complaints lodged against them, they have seen mixed outcomes in legal battles, winning 40 cases and losing 35. This post analyzes their legal performance, highlighting patterns in both their losses and victories and offering insights for potential buyers.
Overview of Legal Performance
Complaints Summary
- Total Complaints: 75
- Cases Won: 40
- Cases Lost: 35
Common Factors in Lost Cases
A significant number of lost cases for CANOPY GRANVIZ DEVELOPERS revolve around the submission of Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs). The majority of appellant claims assert that the builder failed to submit these reports on time or at all, which is critical under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.
- Patterns Observed:
- Repeated Complaints: Many cases feature identical claims where appellants consistently state non-submission …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Canopy Granviz Developers, where the builder lost, reveals a consistent pattern of disputes primarily centered around the failure to comply with regulatory requirements, particularly concerning the submission of Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs) on the RERA web portal.
The cases can be grouped into several common themes. The predominant issue involves Failure to Submit Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs), which led to multiple cases where the builder was penalized for non-compliance. The reasons provided for this failure varied; often, the builder claimed to have submitted the reports, but they were not uploaded due to technical issues or other unspecified reasons. This highlights a significant communication or operational gap between the builder's reporting processes and the RERA's reporting requirements.
Penalties for Non-Compliance and Project Delays constitute another major theme. In these cases, the builder faced penalties not only for the delayed submission of QPRs …
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, CANOPY GRANVIZ DEVELOPERS, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
Several recurring themes emerged from the cases, primarily focused on non-compliance with Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs) and associated penalties for their delayed submission. Many complaints centered around allegations of the builder's failure to submit required QPRs on the RERA web portal, leading to penalties and potential revocation of registration.
The reasons for bringing these cases against the builder primarily stemmed from contested penalties, claims of project delays, and disagreements over the regulatory requirements. Numerous appella claimed that the builder had not submitted the requisite QPRs on time, thereby showing a pattern where buyers or regulatory bodies sought to enforce compliance through legal channels.
The builder won these cases due, in part, to insufficient evidence presented by the opposing parties. Many claims were challenged on grounds of the builder demonstrating …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!