CCS REAL ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED logo

CCS REAL ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Punjab
CINU70109CH2019PTC042548
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressB210, 2ND FLOOR, ELANTE OFFICES, PLOT NO. 178-178A INDUSTRIAL AREA, PHASE - 1 , CHANDIGARH, Chandigarh, India - 160002
Company StatusPrivate

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the dynamic world of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial to ensuring a positive investment experience. Today, we will explore CCS Real Estate Private Limited, a builder primarily operating in the Indian state of Punjab. This analysis will delve into the performance metrics of the builder, focusing on customer complaints, legal disputes, and what potential buyers should keep in mind.

Overview of CCS Real Estate Private Limited

CCS Real Estate Private Limited is a player in the real estate market of Punjab. The company has garnered one recorded complaint and has faced one legal case, which it lost.

Legal Case Insights

Cases Filed Against the Builder
  • Total Cases: 1
  • Cases Won: 0
  • Cases Lost: 1

Case Summary

  • A single case was filed against the builder, leading to a final verdict of dismissal as it was withdrawn by the parties involved. This indicates that while there was a dispute, it did not reach a conclusion in favor of the builder.

Analysis of Legal Performance

Patterns in Cases Lost

Given that CCS Real Estate has only lost one case, there is limited data to establish a broad pattern. However, the outcome suggests that unresolved disputes may not always lead to a final verdict, indicating a situation where parties may reach an agreed resolution outside of court. The single lost case reinforces the importance of transparency and satisfactory communication between builders and buyers to avoid potential conflict.

Patterns in Cases Won

As no cases were won, it’s challenging to extract patterns from victories. The case that was withdrawn does not reflect the builder's performance advantage in conflict resolution, showing that CCS Real Estate may need improvement in handling disputes or ensuring customer satisfaction to maintain a favorable standing.

Conclusion

Based on the limited data available, CCS Real Estate Private Limited presents a mixed picture. The builder has faced a complaint and a legal case, which it ultimately lost, but with only one case on record, it’s important to treat this information with caution. For potential buyers, it might be worthwhile to conduct thorough research, seek additional feedback from former customers, and consider the builder's overall reputation in the region.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  1. Due Diligence: Research extensively about the builder's past projects and customer experiences. Reviews and testimonials can be incredibly insightful.
  2. Legal Clarity: Ensure that all agreements are stated clearly in contracts and consult a legal advisor to understand your rights.
  3. Open Communication: Maintain clear communication channels with the builder to resolve any issues before they escalate.
  4. Project Verification: Visit ongoing or completed projects to assess quality firsthand.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

  • Check Reputation: Look for builders with a solid reputation and a track record of happy customers.
  • Understand Financial Health: Ensure that the builder is financially stable and capable of completing the project within the promised timeline.
  • Consult Authorities: Verify all legal licenses and approvals from local authorities before finalizing with any builder.

In conclusion, while CCS Real Estate Private Limited may have some challenges reflected in their complaint and legal history, diligence and prudence can help potential buyers make informed decisions.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Project Delay Disputes Regulatory Compliance Issues

Analysis of the cases filed against CCS Real Estate Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three main topics: Delayed Possession Claims, Project Delay Disputes, and Regulatory Compliance Issues.

The first type, Delayed Possession Claims, involves cases where buyers or investors claimed that the builder failed to deliver units within the promised timeline. A common reason for these claims was the builder's inability to meet deadlines due to various factors, which were often attributed to other parties involved in the project or to unforeseen circumstances. However, the builder’s defenses in these cases were insufficient to convince the court that the delays were justified.

Project Delay Disputes revolve around the builder's accountability for delays in the overall project completion. In these cases, plaintiffs often argued that the builder did not fulfill their commitments, which led to additional costs and inconvenience. The builder's responses typically contested these assertions, claiming that delays were due to complex, atypical situations. Nonetheless, the verdicts favored the plaintiffs, indicating a degree of discrediting of the builder's excuses.

Lastly, Regulatory Compliance Issues encompass disputes related to the builder's adherence to legal and regulatory standards, including zoning laws and required permits. Cases within this theme often involved allegations that the builder had non-compliant projects or had failed to secure necessary approvals, leading to legal consequences. The builder's losses in these cases highlight significant shortcomings in their operational processes, particularly concerning regulatory compliance, which reflects a pattern of neglecting crucial legal requirements.

A pattern emerges from these summaries: common triggers for the builder's litigation include contesting penalties for delays, disputing project timelines, and disagreements over regulatory compliance. The builder consistently faced allegations of insufficient accountability, resulting in legal actions that ultimately ended in their defeat.

The reasons for the builder's losses are multifaceted but typically center around insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to comply with legal standards, and a lack of transparency in their dealings. The consistent withdrawal or loss of cases suggests that CCS Real Estate Private Limited may have underestimated the legal implications of their actions and the importance of fulfilling commitments to their clients.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review